From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Stable <stable@kernel.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH V4] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during demux for FUTEX_WAIT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:13:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA7719F.4060905@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110414215656.GB14169@kroah.com>
On 04/14/2011 02:56 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to
>> restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal.
>>
>> Commit b41277dc7a18ee332d in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally
>> removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the setup
>> of the restart block. Restore the originaly behavior.
>>
>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922
>>
>> V2: Added references to commit message.
>> V3: Set flag during restart block instead of do_futex()
>> V4: Correct stupid order of assignment mistake pointed out by Eric
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>> Reported-by: Tim Smith <tsmith201104@yahoo.com>
>> Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> CC: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> for how to do this properly.
Sigh, apologies. Fixing, will add stable to CC: in changelog. Gives me a
chance to improve the subject anyway.
Ingo, Greg, please ignore this and the previous V[123] patches.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 21:43 Darren Hart
2011-04-14 21:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 21:56 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-04-14 22:13 ` Darren Hart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA7719F.4060905@linux.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome