mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Borisov <ext-roman.borisov@nokia.com>
To: ext Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, vda.linux@googlemail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: bound mount propagation fix
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:02:04 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB1440C.8080000@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110421130412.ea953cbc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On 04/22/2011 12:04 AM, ext Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:37:28 +0400
> Roman Borisov<ext-roman.borisov@nokia.com>  wrote:
>
>> MS_SILENT flag cleaning up added to flags_to_propagation_type function.
>> It was reported that bound mount propagation doesn't work in busybox as by
>> default busybox mount applet sets the MS_SILENT flag for any mount operation.
>> Moreover recently added flags_to_propagation_type function doesn't allow to
>> do such operations as --make-[r]private --make-[r]shared etc. when MS_SILENT
>> is on.
>> The idea to clean MS_SILENT flag belongs to Denys Vlasenko<vda.linux@googlemail.com>
>>
>
> This is not an adequate changelog, IMO.  It has almost no description
> of the errant user-visible kernel behaviour and almost no description
> of what was wrong with the kernel code - ie, why the kernel was doing
> the wrong thing.
>
Hello,

I understand that description I've sent is not so clear for end-user. 
But there are two issues:
1. This is busybox related issue; only in busybox MS_SILENT is on for 
all mount operations; I don't know how to reproduce it in 
util-linux->mount without hardcoding;
2. initial scenario didn't consider "VFS: Sanity check mount flags 
passed to change_mnt_propagation()" patch (commit 
7a2e8a8faab76386d8eaae9ded739ee5615be174);

> I've pieced together a fix for the first problem but then got lazy.
Previously we used such script:

# mkdir -p mount.dir mount.shared1 mount.shared2
# touch mount.dir/a mount.dir/b
# mount -vv --bind mount.shared1 mount.shared1
# mount -vv --make-rshared mount.shared1
# mount -vv --bind mount.shared2 mount.shared2
# mount -vv --make-rshared mount.shared2
# mount -vv --bind mount.shared2 mount.shared1
# mount -vv --bind mount.dir     mount.shared2
# ls -R mount.dir mount.shared1 mount.shared2
mount.dir:
a  b
mount.shared1:
mount.shared2:
a  b
#

but expected result is:

# ls -R mount.dir mount.shared1 mount.shared2
mount.dir:
a  b
mount.shared1:
a  b
mount.shared2:
a  b
#

My "[PATCH] fs: bound mount propagation fix" fixed this issue but as I 
said I didn't consider Valerie's patch;

After I've applied the "VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to 
change_mnt_propagation()" patch I have *another wrong result*:

# mkdir -p mount.dir mount.shared1 mount.shared2
# touch mount.dir/a mount.dir/b
# mount -vv --bind mount.shared1 mount.shared1
# mount -vv --make-rshared mount.shared1
mount: mount.shared1: Invalid argument
#

> Please can someone provide an analysis of what was causing this bug?
>
Now the debugging shows that MS_SILENT came to 
flags_to_propagation_type() and causes the error return after the 
is_power_of_2 checking; clearing the MS_SILENT flag fixes this issue.

> And has this v3 patch been tested with Denys's reproducer?
>
Yes I've applied Valerie's and my patches and tested the scenario in 
busybox environment; the verdict is passed;
I'll post [PATCH v4] with full description today.

--
Roman

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-22  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1303304011.git.ext-roman.borisov@nokia.com>
2011-04-20 14:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Roman Borisov
2011-04-21 20:04   ` [PATCH v3] " Andrew Morton
2011-04-22  9:02     ` Roman Borisov [this message]
2011-04-22 11:05     ` [PATCH v4] fs: namespacec " Roman Borisov
2011-03-14  4:20 2.6.35-rc4: mount results with and without MS_SILENT differ Denys Vlasenko
2011-03-25  3:47 ` Chuck Ebbert
2011-03-26 21:43   ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-04-01 14:48     ` [PATCH] fs: bound mount propagation fix Roman Borisov
2011-04-12 10:28       ` Roman Borisov
2011-04-19 21:04       ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-20 11:51         ` Roman Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB1440C.8080000@nokia.com \
    --to=ext-roman.borisov@nokia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome