mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Coreutils <coreutils@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:48:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB597E3.7090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110425150227.GA10653@elliptictech.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2349 bytes --]

On 04/25/2011 09:02 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:

Hi Nick,
> * File A (sparse file created by lseek/write beyond end-of-file):
> 
>     data | hole 0 | data || hole 1 (virtual)
> 
> * File B (sparse file created by truncate beyond end-of-file):
> 
>     data | hole 0 || hole 1 (virtual)
> 
> Excluding the error description, the term "the last hole" is used in
> two places in your proposal:
> 
>   * (for SEEK_HOLE): if offset falls within "the last hole", then the
>     file offset may be set to the file size instead.
> 
>   * (for SEEK_DATA): it shall be an error ... if offset falls within the
>     last hole.
> 
> I imagine that both of these conditions are intended to address the
> case where the offset falls within hole 0 in File B, that is, when
> there is no non-hole data beyond the specified offset but the offset
> is nevertheless less than the file size.

Correct.

>  However, this looks (to me)
> like the penultimate hole in the file, not the last hole.  Furthermore,
> these conditions are presumably *not* intended to apply to the
> penultimate hole in File A, which has data after it.

Good catch.

> 
> I think my confusion can be avoided by talking about the last non-hole
> data byte in the file (which is unambigious), instead of by talking
> about the last hole.  For instance, the SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA descriptions
> could be written as follows:
> 
>   If whence is SEEK_HOLE, the file offset shall be set to the smallest
>   location of a byte within a hole and not less than offset, except that
>   if offset falls beyond the last byte not within a hole, then the file
>   offset may be set to the file size instead.  It shall be an error if
>   offset is greater or equal to the size of the file.
> 
>   If whence is SEEK_DATA, the file offset shall be set to the smallest
>   location of a byte not within a hole and not less than offset.  It shall
>   be an error if no such byte exists.
> 
> plus a corresponding update to the ENXIO description:
> 
>   ... or the whence argument is SEEK_DATA and the offset falls beyond
>   the last byte not within a hole.

I've added your improved wording as a comment at
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-25 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-21 19:42 Josef Bacik
2011-04-21 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: implement our own ->llseek Josef Bacik
2011-04-21 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags Theodore Tso
2011-04-21 21:29   ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-22  3:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-04-21 22:28 ` Eric Blake
2011-04-22  1:22   ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-22  4:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-22 11:28       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-22 11:50         ` Eric Blake
2011-04-22 16:28           ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-22 16:40             ` Eric Blake
2011-04-22 16:57               ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-22 17:03                 ` Eric Blake
2011-04-22 17:08                   ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-22 18:06                     ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-22 23:33                       ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-24 17:49             ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-25 12:37               ` Eric Blake
2011-04-25 14:15                 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-22 13:06         ` Eric Blake
2011-04-25 15:02           ` Nick Bowler
2011-04-25 15:48             ` Eric Blake [this message]
2011-04-22 11:41     ` Eric Blake
2011-04-22  4:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-22 20:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-22 20:49   ` Sunil Mushran
2011-04-25  3:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB597E3.7090600@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=coreutils@gnu.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome