mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Fix EDD3.0 data verification.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:33:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB87D93.4060108@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427123213.GL2265@redhat.com>

On 04/27/2011 05:32 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> 
> This patch is only fixes obviously incorrect code in edd_has_edd30()
> to do proper check instead of summing random memory and it should be
> applied even if we decide that we want to support Phoenix spec too.
> 
> I looked into implementing support for Phoenix spec back then when I
> wrote the patch and I decided against it. The main (and may be only)
> use case for edd module is to provide OS installer with enough info
> for it to decide where to install boot loader. Unfortunately Phoenix
> EDD spec does not support most modern storage technologies and even for
> legacy one such as ATA it does not provide enough info to determine boot
> disk correctly (you can't tell the difference between two ATA channels,
> T13 spec provides this info in interface path along with PCI address).
> So even if we would have support for it the OS installer will have to
> check if the information comes from T13 or Phoenix and ignore it if it's
> the later.
> 

I still think it would be a lot better to let userspace decide how it
wants to handle things, but oh well.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-27 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-26  8:21 Gleb Natapov
2011-04-26 22:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-27 12:32   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-04-27 20:33     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-04-27 22:36 ` [tip:x86/setup] x86, setup: " tip-bot for Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB87D93.4060108@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome