On 05/07/2011 01:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:26:49AM +0200, Javier Muņoz wrote:
>> On 05/06/2011 11:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote:
>>>> This patch implements dynamic framebuffer mode setting.
[...]
>>>
>>> This applies with fuzz, this leads me to believe that you didn't test
>>> this on the latest linux-next tree, right?
>>>
>>> What did you make this patch against?
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't know. I made this patch against
>> linux-2.6 (bfd412db9e7b0d8f7b9c09d12d07aa2ac785f1d0) as I did with
>> previous patches.
>>
>> Testing was about creating, applying, compiling and running patch
>> with kernel built from linux-2.6
>>
>> Do you need a new patch against linux-next's master? I can redo this patch.
>
> Yes, please always make patches against linux-next as it includes any
> other pending patches that are in my tree.

OK, just resending a new patch made against linux-next. Please, let me 
know if it applies seamless.

Thanks!

javi