From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751703Ab1FHC35 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:29:57 -0400 Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:45487 "EHLO sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055Ab1FHC34 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:29:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4DEEDEA1.6070200@dsn.okisemi.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:29:53 +0900 From: Tomoya MORINAGA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com, qi.wang@intel.com, yong.y.wang@intel.com, toshiharu-linux@dsn.okisemi.com, kok.howg.ewe@intel.com, joel.clark@intel.com Subject: Re: [RESEND]: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] pch_gpio: support interrupt function References: <4DEDBE90.3090305@dsn.okisemi.com> <20110607172211.GF17754@ponder.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20110607172211.GF17754@ponder.secretlab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (2011/06/08 2:22), Grant Likely wrote: > No, I'm saying that you don't need to implement new irq_chip > operations if you use the new irq_chip_generic implementation. I understand your saying. It seems "new irq_chip_generic" was implemented in linux-3.0. However "irq_chip_generic" is not implemented in stable kernel version. Right ? So, first of all, could you accept this patch ? After the kernel version becomes stable, I will resubmit a patch for "new irq_chip_generic". -- tomoya OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.