From: Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Log flood: "scheduling while atomic" (2.6.15.x, 2.6.16.x)
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1FB78B33%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060429182220.0a306fe2.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2396 bytes --]
I demand that Andrew Morton may or may not have written...
> Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> I'm seeing bouts of log flooding caused by something presumably not
>> releasing a lock. I've looked at some of the messages, but at around
>> 100/s, I'm not too keen to look through the whole lot :-)
>> scheduling while atomic: swapper/0xafbfffff/0
>> [show_trace+19/32]
>> [dump_stack+30/32]
>> [schedule+1278/1472]
>> [cpu_idle+88/96]
>> [stext+44/64]
>> [start_kernel+574/704]
>> [L6+0/2] 0xc0100199
>> (Trailing parts of some lines have been omitted; it's all repeated data.
>> And some sort of rate-limiting of these messages would be nice, but some
>> other way to draw attention to the problem, e.g. an occasional beep, would
>> be good.)
>> The most recent instance occurred a few minutes into recording a TV
>> programme (via vdr) from a cx88-based Nova-T. (I'm currently using stock
>> drivers rather than ones built from the v4l-dvb repository.)
> Thanks for the report.
> The below patch (against 2.6.17-rc3) should, if it still works, tell us
> which lock didn't get unlocked.
> You'll need to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER.
Done, compiled, rebooted. I have a recording scheduled for later; I'll wait
and see what happens.
> Please cc video4linux-list@redhat.com on any result if it looks like v4l is
> indeed the culprit.
Will do.
BTW, patches applied:
* the advansys patch from -mm;
* BROKEN removed from the depends for advansys;
* quietening of dprintk(0,...) (replaced with dprintk(1,...) in
cx88-mpeg.c (these messages have some annoyance value);
* a patch of my own for usbhid for a slightly weird USB+PS/2 mouse,
connected via USB (I'll post this as directed in MAINTAINERS);
* another of my own (attached for reference) which *should* rate-limit the
"scheduling while atomic" messages somewhat.
The last one is new; the rest don't have any bearing on the problem, which
has occurred without them and, indeed, without the presence of advansys and
usbhid.
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Lobby friends, family, business, government. WE'RE KILLING THE PLANET.
He is truly wise who gains wisdom from another's mishap.
[-- Attachment #2: sched_atomic_ratelimit_hack.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 978 bytes --]
--- 2.6.17-rc3/kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ 2.6.17-rc3/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2904,10 +2904,28 @@
* Otherwise, whine if we are scheduling when we should not be.
*/
if (unlikely(in_atomic() && !current->exit_state)) {
+ /* Hack to avoid *serious* log-flooding. */
+ static int skipped = -50; /* want to report the first 50 */
+ static unsigned long last = 0;
+ int doprint = 1;
+ if (skipped < 0) {
+ if (!++skipped)
+ last = jiffies;
+ } else if (jiffies - last < 5 * HZ) /* should be 5s */ {
+ if (skipped < 0x7FFFFFFF)
+ ++skipped;
+ doprint = 0;
+ }
+ if (doprint) {
+ last = jiffies;
+ if (skipped)
+ printk(KERN_ERR "[%d s-w-a not reported]\n", skipped);
+ skipped = 0;
printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while atomic: "
"%s/0x%08x/%d\n",
current->comm, preempt_count(), current->pid);
dump_stack();
+ }
}
profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-30 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-29 20:45 Darren Salt
2006-04-30 1:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-30 14:21 ` Darren Salt [this message]
2006-05-05 23:30 ` Darren Salt
2006-05-06 17:34 ` Log flood: "scheduling while atomic" (2.6.15.x, 2.6.16.x) - backtrace captured Darren Salt
2006-05-08 16:48 ` Darren Salt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E1FB78B33%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk \
--to=linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®