From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josef Holzmayr <holzmayr@rsi-elektrotechnik.de>,
Nico Erfurth <ne@erfurth.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: changes for next
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:03:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6DCAF5.50607@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109102306.58340.arnd@arndb.de>
Le 10/09/2011 23:06, Arnd Bergmann :
> On Friday 09 September 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Can you please pull the following changes since commit ddf28352b80c86754a6424e3a61e8bdf9213b3c7:
>>
>> Linux 3.1-rc5 (2011-09-04 15:45:10 -0700)
>>
>> They are available in the git repository at:
>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git at91-next
>>
>> They have been present on linux-arm-kernel for some time and where recently added in linux-next.
>> Stephen resolved some trivial conflicts relatives to the removal of a board file (Cf:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/96 ).
>>
>> A series by Thomas is touching the USB subsystem: ohci-at91.c but as most of changes are in the at91 directory, it makes more sense to take them in arm-soc.
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I've resumed pulling patches and uploaded them to git.linaro.org while
> master.kernel.org continues to be unavailable.
>
> I've decided to split your branch into two separate branches 'board'
> and 'devel' to better match the code from other soc trees in a way
> that I can send forward to Linus. Please check that the split trees
> actually make sense, and tell me if that's ok for you or if you would
> prefer them split differently.
I have checked and It is perfect for me.
Thanks a lot Arnd, bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-12 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-09 12:42 Nicolas Ferre
2011-09-10 21:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-12 9:03 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E6DCAF5.50607@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=holzmayr@rsi-elektrotechnik.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=ne@erfurth.eu \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome