Am 10.10.2011 13:09, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Since ramfs is hard-selected to "y", the module leftovers make
>> no sense.
> 
> Removing the dead code looks good, but what is the point in using
> device_initcall?  We've always been using module_init for non-modular
> code, though.
> 

Ah, ok!
So we can keep the module_init()?
I was not sure whether it's valid to use module_init() in pure
non-modular code...

Thanks,
//richard