From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, bp@amd64.org, pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
tj@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
rdunlap@xenotime.net, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ashok.raj@intel.com, tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Mutually exclude cpu online and suspend/hibernate
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:15:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E92E8E0.4090004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010123242.15067.48238.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
On 10/10/2011 06:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Don't allow cpu hotplug online operation and suspend/hibernate to run in
> parallel. If suspend/hibernate has already started, fail the cpu online
> operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 12b7458..bc8c7d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* Serializes the updates to cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask */
> @@ -366,6 +367,14 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
> }
> #endif
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent cpu online and suspend/hibernate (including freezer)
> + * operations from running in parallel. Fail cpu online if suspend or
> + * hibernate has already started.
> + */
> + if (!trylock_pm_sleep())
Would it be better to hook into the suspend/hibernate notifiers and
use them to exclude cpu hotplug from suspend/hibernate, instead of
trying to take pm_mutex lock like this?
Peter, I remember you pointing out in another patch's review
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1198312/focus=1199087)
that introducing more locks in cpu hotplug would be a bad idea. Does that
comment hold here as well, or is this fine?
Anyways, I'll start working on that other implementation that hooks onto
the suspend/hibernate notifiers and see if that works out better.
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
>
> if (cpu_hotplug_disabled) {
> @@ -377,6 +386,7 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
>
> out:
> cpu_maps_update_done();
> + unlock_pm_sleep();
> return err;
> }
>
>
--
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Systems and Technology Lab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 12:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] Freezer, CPU hotplug, x86 Microcode: Fix task freezing failures Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Introduce helper functions Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Mutually exclude cpu online and suspend/hibernate Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-10-10 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 15:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-11 20:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-11 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-12 3:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-12 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-12 21:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-12 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 15:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-13 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-13 17:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-13 17:29 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-13 18:03 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-10 15:25 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-10 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-11 9:37 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Update documentation Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Freezer, CPU hotplug, x86 Microcode: Fix task freezing failures Alan Stern
2011-10-10 15:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 16:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2011-10-10 17:30 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 17:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 18:08 ` tj
2011-10-10 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 18:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 18:53 ` tj
2011-10-10 19:00 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 20:35 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20111010202913.GA30798@aftab>
2011-10-10 21:13 ` tj
2011-10-11 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E92E8E0.4090004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome