From: Philipp Herz - Profihost AG <p.herz@profihost.ag>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
s.priebe@profihost.ag, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Vanilla-Kernel 3 - page allocation failure
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:21:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA51210.9070209@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319439819.2517.38.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Am 24.10.2011 09:03, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le lundi 24 octobre 2011 à 08:33 +0200, Philipp Herz - Profihost AG a
> écrit :
>> Am 19.10.2011 03:58, schrieb David Rientjes:
>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Philipp Herz - Profihost AG<p.herz@profihost.ag> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> After updating kernel (x86_64) to stable version 3 there are a few
>>>>> messages appearing in the kernel log such as
>>>>>
>>>>> kworker/0:1: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x20
>>>>> mysql: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x20
>>>>> php5: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x20
>>>>
>>>> You just ran out of memory.
>>>>
>>>
>>> He ran out of order-1 physically contiguous memory and was unable to
>>> compact or reclaim because of the atomic context.
>>>
>>> Philipp, based on your pastes from another post, it's evident you're using
>>> CONFIG_SLAB and, unfortunately, it's not possible to change to single
>>> page allocations (which would only result in a page allocation failure if
>>> you were completely out of memory) without recompiling.
>>>
>>> You have a couple options:
>>>
>>> - recompile with BREAK_GFP_ORDER_HI redefined to 0 in mm/slab.c, or
>>>
>>> - recompile with CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB.
>>>
>>> It's very possible that neither of these will help, but it will tell you
>>> whether you need to go out and buy more RAM or not. If you try to
>>> recompile with BREAK_GFP_ORDER_HI, these may turn into order-0
>>> allocations. If you can't reboot, send the output of
>>> /proc/<pid>/net/protocols where<pid> is the pid of one of the above tasks
>>> (kworker, mysql, php5) when they are running and we'll know.
>>>
>>> [ Changing slab_break_gfp_order should really be a CONFIG_SLAB command-
>>> line option. It can't be runtime because slab depends on the order for
>>> caches remaining constant, but we can certainly change it on boot. ]
>>>
>>> If you try CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB, you can pass
>>> slub_max_order=0 on the command line and see if it helps.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> we have recompiled the kernel of one machine with CONFIG_SLUB instead of
>> CONFIG_SLAB, but it is showing similar message.
>>
>> Now it's showing failure at "order:5, mode:0x4020".
>>
>> Call trace can be found at:
>> * http://pastebin.com/uGJiwvG1
>>
>> Comparing kernel 2.6.32 (mm/page_alloc.c) there seams to be the same way
>> of dealing with page allocation.
>>
>> Do you have an idea why these (warning) messages do never appear running
>> 2.6.32?
>
> Your tg3 has a firmware limitation, and some skbs using fragments have
> to be reallocated using a single and contiguous area of memory.
>
> Initial skb delivered by tcp stack only uses order-0 pages, but the
> reallocated one, being 64K, can be order-5
>
> You can avoid this by following tuning :
>
> ethtool -K eth0 sg off
>
ok,
does that mean that there was no firmware limitation with kernel 2.6.32
or that the tg3 module has any "disable warnings" flag matching
__GFP_NOWARN?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-24 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 10:25 Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-18 11:32 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2011-10-18 12:07 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-18 12:38 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2011-10-18 13:24 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-18 14:35 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2011-10-19 6:45 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-18 15:51 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-18 17:02 ` Dave Jones
2011-10-18 18:59 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-19 1:58 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-24 6:33 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-24 7:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-24 7:21 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG [this message]
2011-10-24 8:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-24 8:19 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-24 8:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-24 8:36 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-26 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-27 7:13 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
2011-10-27 20:08 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 21:11 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-21 6:36 ` Philipp Herz - Profihost AG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA51210.9070209@profihost.ag \
--to=p.herz@profihost.ag \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome