From: Clarinet <clarinet@atlas.cz>
To: 647095@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:49:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC43DF7.4010902@atlas.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBD2825.6050806@atlas.cz>
Hi all,
>> Result of bisecting: v2.6.38-rc1 exhibits the problem. v2.6.37 and
>> many of the topic branches merged in the 2.6.38 merge window work ok.
>> Some other topic branches do not boot at all.
>>
>> Jiri: if you have gitk installed, then "git bisect visualize" can help
>> get a sense of what's in the middle of the regression range.
>> "gitk --bisect --first-parent v2.6.37..v2.6.38-rc1" might be a good way
>> to find mainline commits to test before finding a topic branch to delve
>> into.
>
> I have been able to narrow the interval manually a little bit from the
> "top" (the bad side) and I will go on from the bottom now. However,
> there seems to be a large area where kernels are unbootable for me -
> they mostly stop when init is called and I do not know why.
Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
solved I have been able to bisect without "skipping". The result is
surprising (at least for me) - believe it or not, the first bad commit
is 6610e089 "RTC: Rework RTC code to use timerqueue for events" from
John Stultz (I am sending him a copy of this message).
I would never expect this would be a problem, but my understanding of
this commit is very limited, so I am certainly missing the point.
However, I have tried to compile 2.6.38 (which was "bad") with "Real
Time Clock" configuration option turned off and it behaves "normally"
then (= is "good").
Can you please comment this result? What does it mean? Any idea what is
"wrong" there?
Best regards,
Jiri Polach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-16 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111030110543.5872.61279.reportbug@supermicro.uochb.cas.cz>
2011-10-30 15:25 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-10-31 13:06 ` Clarinet
2011-11-08 12:33 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-10 1:52 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-11-11 13:50 ` Clarinet
2011-11-16 22:49 ` Clarinet [this message]
2011-11-17 20:32 ` John Stultz
2011-11-17 23:42 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-17 23:53 ` John Stultz
2011-11-21 13:27 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-21 20:02 ` John Stultz
2011-11-21 21:31 ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-29 2:31 ` John Stultz
2011-11-29 12:26 ` Clarinet
2011-11-29 23:34 ` John Stultz
2011-12-02 10:44 ` Clarinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC43DF7.4010902@atlas.cz \
--to=clarinet@atlas.cz \
--cc=647095@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome