From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] trace: add ability to collect call chain of non-current task.
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:14:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE903B1.7000600@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE1EC0B.4020600@openvz.org>
On 12/9/11 3:07 AM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> Attached is an alternative approach that does what you allude to above.
>
> * Your method doesn't work for rt scheduler.
This is no worse than sched_stat_{iowait,sleep} which are also CFS specific?
> * It doesn't distinguish blocking time and sleeping time.
Can't we distinguish based on next->state?
> * This patch does a bit mess between subsystems...
Which subsystems?
>> perf record -agPe sched:sched_switch --filter "delay > 1000000" --
>> sleep 1
>
> Why do you need the option "-a" ?
>
I'd love to see it work without the -a (so normal users can use it).
I guess I'll need to move the trace_sched_switch() tracepoint to be
after perf_event_task_sched_in() in finish_task_switch().
>>
>> allows us to collect a lot less. For some reason, "perf script" shows
>
>> the correct delay field, but the sample period still contains 1 (i.e
>> __perf_count() hint is not working for me).
>
> Which kernel do you use? Does it contain "[PATCH] event: don't divide
> events if it has field period"? It works fine with my kernel...
>
I was using 3.2-rc2. I picked up the patch you reference above.
# perf report -D | grep SAMPLE.*period:
3 1437330416084 0x26d908 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806:
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0
3 1437330422290 0x26db58 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806:
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0
3 1437330428485 0x26dda8 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806:
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0
# perf script | grep next_comm=test.*delay | head -3
test 13070 [023] 1437.320529: sched_switch:
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==>
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877
test 13070 [023] 1437.320531: sched_switch:
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==>
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877
test 13070 [023] 1437.320532: sched_switch:
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==>
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877
The period still looks bogus i.e. doesn't match delay.
Thanks for reviewing. I'll clean up some of these issues and post a new
patch in a couple of days.
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-26 15:55 [PATCH 0/4] trace: add ability to collect call chains " Andrew Vagin
2011-09-26 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: fix counter of ftrace events Andrew Vagin
2011-10-14 19:11 ` Arun Sharma
2011-09-26 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] trace: prepare to collect call chains of non-current task Andrew Vagin
2011-09-27 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-14 19:12 ` Arun Sharma
2011-09-26 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] trace: add ability to collect call chain " Andrew Vagin
2011-09-27 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-27 20:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-28 13:53 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-12-08 2:02 ` Arun Sharma
2011-12-09 11:07 ` Andrey Vagin
2011-12-14 20:14 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2011-12-15 15:19 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-12-15 19:08 ` Arun Sharma
2011-12-16 0:15 ` Arun Sharma
2011-09-26 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] events: sched_stat_template saves call chains of a target task Andrew Vagin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE903B1.7000600@fb.com \
--to=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome