mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: rbenyehuda@manz.com
Cc: "wad@chromium.org" <wad@chromium.org>,
	"kay.sievers@vrfy.org" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Rasty Slutsker <RSlutsker@manz.com>,
	Lior Brafman <LBrafman@manz.com>,
	raziebe@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Subject:[PATCH 1:1] boot paramer "root=" gets a list of devices
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEA10BC.3000906@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323962398.11872.3.camel@raz>

On 12/15/2011 07:19 AM, Raz Ben Yehuda wrote:
>>
>> To which point I have to ask, once again, at which point we stop putting
>> this stuff in the kernel to "bypass the need for initramfs"...
> because there are times where we cannot use initramfs. is this a problem
> with way i phrase or with with the whole idea ?
>

There are problems with the whole concept of "cannot use initramfs".  We 
allow the initramfs to be integrated with the kernel image for a reason, 
for example.

I'm obviously ranting on this in part to make people think about what 
they are doing, and partly to remind that the more complex the in-kernel 
root-mounting code get, the more it might be worth reconsidering klibc 
in the kernel build tree.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-15 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1323940396.16032.2.camel@raz>
     [not found] ` <4EEA0C05.4030907@zytor.com>
2011-12-15 15:19   ` Raz Ben Yehuda
2011-12-15 15:22     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-12-15 18:11       ` Kay Sievers
2011-12-18  8:54         ` Raz Ben Yehuda
2012-01-04 17:48           ` Will Drewry
2011-12-15  9:17 Raz Ben Yehuda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEA10BC.3000906@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=LBrafman@manz.com \
    --cc=RSlutsker@manz.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raziebe@gmail.com \
    --cc=rbenyehuda@manz.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome