From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:36:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEFE6B7.2010101@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324306673-4282-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On 12/19/11 06:57, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is version 2 of the set of patches for removing
> __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was updated to allow
> for the pgd switch not to be deferred if switch_mm() is called with
> interrupts enabled. This is required for cases where switch_mm() is
> called directly (currently from use_mm() and idle_task_exit()) without a
> corresponding finish_arch_post_lock_switch() call. The original changes
> to activate_mm() were also reverted since switch_mm() can do the actual
> pgd switch when the interrupts are enabled.
>
> If there are no objections, I'd like to push the series to -next to get
> more exposure (the patches are aimed for 3.4-rc1 unless other issues are
> found in the meantime).
Version 2 looks good to me. Thanks!
-Frank
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 14:57 Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler hook Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: Use TTBR1 instead of reserved context ID Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: Allow ASID 0 to be allocated to tasks Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ASID-capable CPUs Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: Remove current_mm per-cpu variable Catalin Marinas
2011-12-19 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs Catalin Marinas
2011-12-20 1:36 ` Frank Rowand
2011-12-20 1:36 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEFE6B7.2010101@am.sony.com \
--to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome