From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: "sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"jedu@slimlogic.co.uk" <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"gg@slimlogic.co.uk" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] mfd: tps65910: Add wakeup support
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:54:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1AA084.9080502@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120120131355.GG18297@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Resending as text formatting was not proper. Sorry for inconvenience..
On Friday 20 January 2012 06:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:37:42PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> No, that's it - when you call those userspace will get control via sysfs
>>> for turning on and off the wakeup support.
>> So should I call them in driver by default without taking parameter
>> from platform data?
> That's the normal behaviour for drivers unless there's some specific
> reason for doing something different. The choice may well depend on the
> application software running on the system rather than the kernel.
Going through the details of documentation under
/sys/devices/.../power/wakeup files of power/device.txt, I think
following should be the change if we want to control the wakeup control
through user sapce:
During initialization of device, we need to tell that device is wakeup
capable and hence we need to call the: device_wakeup_init() and
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true).
Then it exposes the required sysfs to userspace to select the wakeup
enable or not i.e. power/wakeup to be written as enabled or disabled.
Based on user selection, the function device_may_wakeup() will return
true/false based on power/wakeup enabled/disabled. So before entering
into the suspend, we need to check this function and call
enable_irq_wakeup() to have the wakeup enabled actually in the soc. In
resume we need to call disable_irq_wake() again.
If this is correct approach then I can push the another patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-21 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 11:09 Laxman Dewangan
2012-01-20 12:51 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-20 13:00 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-01-20 13:02 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-20 13:07 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-01-20 13:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-21 8:10 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-01-21 11:24 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-01-21 12:51 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-21 12:57 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F1AA084.9080502@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=jedu@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome