mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: fix socket memcg build with !CONFIG_NET
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:17:26 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1AC8F6.1060703@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120120.141446.136970067758991080.davem@davemloft.net>

On 01/20/2012 11:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:57:14 +0400
>
>> There is still a build bug with the sock memcg code, that triggers
>> with !CONFIG_NET, that survived my series of randconfig builds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@xenotime.net>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Why are you undoing the static branch optimization?  That was a one of
> the things that made me agree to even putting this code in.
>
> Find a way to fix this without removing the static branch.
>
Dave,

I am not removing the static branch. This is just a macro, that expands 
to the static branch when the options are in place, and to 0 if they are 
not.

if (0) { } is certainly be removed to the compiler, so the code is out
anyway.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-21 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-20 14:57 [PATCH 0/3] fixes for tcp memcg Glauber Costa
2012-01-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: fix socket memcg build with !CONFIG_NET Glauber Costa
2012-01-20 19:14   ` David Miller
2012-01-21 14:17     ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-01-22 19:35       ` David Miller
2012-01-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: make sure memcg margin is 0 when over limit Glauber Costa
2012-01-20 17:08   ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-24  8:12   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: introduce res_counter_charge_nofail() for socket allocations Glauber Costa
2012-01-20 17:07   ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-24  8:15   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F1AC8F6.1060703@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome