From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753244Ab2AWQTd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:19:33 -0500 Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.8]:33837 "HELO oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752332Ab2AWQTc (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:19:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1D9644.7090707@xenotime.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:17:56 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: YPO4 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110323 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] docbook: fix sched source file names in device-drivers book References: <4F1B0BFC.2010105@xenotime.net> <1327308902.2442.256.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1327308902.2442.256.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/23/2012 12:55 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 11:03 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> Fix warning since kernel scheduler functions and kernel-doc >> notation were moved to other files. >> >> docproc: lnx-33-rc1/kernel/sched.c: No such file or directory >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> Cc: Ingo Molnar >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra >> --- >> Documentation/DocBook/device-drivers.tmpl | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> --- lnx-33-rc1.orig/Documentation/DocBook/device-drivers.tmpl >> +++ lnx-33-rc1/Documentation/DocBook/device-drivers.tmpl >> @@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ >> >> Delaying, scheduling, and timer routines >> !Iinclude/linux/sched.h >> -!Ekernel/sched.c >> +!Ekernel/sched/core.c >> +!Ikernel/sched/cpupri.c >> +!Ikernel/sched/fair.c > > There's more files in there, they might not include proper kerneldoc > comments, but shouldn't they be included anyway? Only the ones that have kernel-doc comments are listed here. > Also, what the difference between Ekernel and Ikernel? !Efilename is for files that contain exported symbols and it only lists the exports. !Ifilename is for files that contain kernel-doc for internal functions. It is OK to use both of them for one filename so that both exports and internal functions are listed in the generated output. >> !Iinclude/linux/completion.h >> !Ekernel/timer.c >> > > > -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***