From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@elte.hu, acme@infradead.org, robert.richter@amd.com,
ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org, asharma@fb.com,
ravitillo@lbl.gov, vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported (v3)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:45:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F224EF9.5040307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326127761-2723-10-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
On Monday 09 January 2012 10:19 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* is disabled for:
> - SW events (sw counters, tracepoints)
> - HW breakpoints
> - ALL but Intel X86 architecture
> - AMD64 processors
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
> arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
> arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
> arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
> arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c | 3 +++
> kernel/events/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 6 ++++++
> 9 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 8143cd7..0dae252 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -685,6 +685,10 @@ static int alpha_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> int err;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (event->attr.type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
> case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 88b0941..42262ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -540,6 +540,10 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> int err = 0;
> atomic_t *active_events = &armpmu->active_events;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_smpl(event))
I guess this would be 'has_branch_stack' instead of 'has_branch_smpl'.
'has_branch_smpl' has not been defined any where but getting called here.
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (armpmu->map_event(event) == -ENOENT)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> index 315fc0b..7070f8c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,10 @@ static int mipspmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (event->attr.type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
> case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> index d614ab5..4e0b265 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -1078,6 +1078,10 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (!ppmu)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (event->attr.type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
> ev = event->attr.config;
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 10b14e3..068b8a2 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,10 @@ static int sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> int err;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (event->attr.type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
> case PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE:
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 614da62..8e16a4a 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -1105,6 +1105,10 @@ static int sparc_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (atomic_read(&nmi_active) < 0)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* does not support taken branch sampling */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (attr->type) {
> case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
> if (attr->config >= sparc_pmu->max_events)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> index 0397b23..0d8da03 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ static int amd_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (event->attr.exclude_host && event->attr.exclude_guest)
> /*
> * When HO == GO == 1 the hardware treats that as GO == HO == 0
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index ed39225..36d1a63 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -5000,6 +5000,12 @@ static int perf_swevent_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /*
> + * no branch sampling for software events
> + */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> switch (event_id) {
> case PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK:
> case PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK:
> @@ -5110,6 +5116,12 @@ static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /*
> + * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
> + */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> err = perf_trace_init(event);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -5335,6 +5347,12 @@ static int cpu_clock_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->attr.config != PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /*
> + * no branch sampling for software events
> + */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> perf_swevent_init_hrtimer(event);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -5409,6 +5427,12 @@ static int task_clock_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> if (event->attr.config != PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /*
> + * no branch sampling for software events
> + */
> + if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> perf_swevent_init_hrtimer(event);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> index b0309f7..cee5423 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,12 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_event_init(struct perf_event *bp)
> if (bp->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /*
> + * no branch sampling for breakpoint events
> + */
> + if (has_branch_stack(bp))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> err = register_perf_hw_breakpoint(bp);
> if (err)
> return err;
--
Linux Technology Centre
IBM Systems and Technology Group
Bangalore India
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 16:49 [PATCH 00/13] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 4:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-27 9:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 02/13] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 5:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 5:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 05/13] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 5:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 06/13] perf_events: disable LBR support for older Intel Atom processors (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 5:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] perf_events: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 7:15 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2012-01-27 9:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-10 1:25 ` Arun Sharma
2012-01-10 15:43 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-09 16:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-23 10:14 ` [PATCH 00/13] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v3) Stephane Eranian
2012-01-23 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-23 15:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-23 15:47 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-23 17:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-24 15:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-24 16:08 ` David Ahern
2012-01-24 17:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-26 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 18:20 ` Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F224EF9.5040307@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome