From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754645Ab2AaONg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:13:36 -0500
Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.3]:59451 "EHLO smtp3-g21.free.fr"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754372Ab2AaONc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:13:32 -0500
Message-ID: <4F27F6F0.7010508@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:13:04 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>,
        Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] coupled cpuidle state support
References: <1324426147-16735-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <4F1929E9.7070707@linaro.org> <CAMbhsRTbVqV6p0py9NGZrpFPf2yvp-B0dr+o-m7qbdja_-Lfzw@mail.gmail.com> <4F200BE2.2070301@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4F200BE2.2070301@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>  wrote:
>>> Hi Colin,
>>>
>>> this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu
>>> dependencies.
>>> What is the status of this patchset ?
>> I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices
>> that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel.  I've started working on an
>> updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while
>> before I can test and post it.  I'm mostly looking for feedback on the
>> approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other
>> SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4.
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more 
> recent kernel ?

Hi Colin,

sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP 
board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits 
with the cpuidle driver.

Thanks
   -- Daniel