From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firewire-sbp2: Ignore SBP-2 targets on the local node
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:16:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F365C01.6000807@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120211122832.25f00d59@stein>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Feb 10 Chris Boot wrote:
>> The firewire-sbp2 module tries to login to an SBP-2/3 target even when
>> it is running on the local node, which fails because of the inability to
>> fetch data from DMA mapped regions using firewire transactions on the
>> local node.
>
> In the long run, we might want to support target and initiator set up to
> reside on the same node and talking to each other via loopback, if
> somebody really needs it and if it can be done with reasonably little
> effort.
Handling SBP data packets in the driver is required if we do not want to
allow remote DMA from any device that claims to be a target. This is
somewhere on my todo list.
>> + /* ignore targets on the local node */
>> + if (device->node == device->card->local_node) {
>> + dev_set_drvdata(&unit->device, NULL);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> But I do wonder: Shouldn't this be implemented by returning from the
> driver probe method with an error?
AFAIK zero means "attach", and the drvdata pointer has no meaning to the
core.
> If so, which errno should be returned?
-ENODEV or -ENXIO.
Regards,
Clemens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-11 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <EE1CAC85-DF0C-4C21-B2BD-446C481C938F@bootc.net>
2012-02-10 13:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] firewire-sbp2: Various fixes Chris Boot
2012-02-10 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] firewire-sbp2: Take into account Unit_Unique_ID Chris Boot
2012-02-11 11:12 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-11 12:26 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-11 13:06 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-10 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] firewire-sbp2: Ignore SBP-2 targets on the local node Chris Boot
2012-02-11 11:28 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-11 12:16 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2012-02-11 12:31 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-11 15:46 ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-11 15:49 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-11 11:56 ` Stefan Richter
2012-02-11 12:32 ` Chris Boot
2012-02-10 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] firewire-sbp2: Fix SCSI sense data mangling Chris Boot
2012-02-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] firewire-sbp2: Various fixes Chris Boot
2012-02-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] firewire-sbp2: Take into account Unit_Unique_ID Chris Boot
2012-02-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] firewire-sbp2: Ignore SBP-2 targets on the local node Chris Boot
2012-02-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] firewire-sbp2: Fix SCSI sense data mangling Chris Boot
2012-02-22 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] firewire-sbp2: Various fixes Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F365C01.6000807@ladisch.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome