From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tom Gundersen" <teg@jklm.no>,
"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@canonical.com>,
"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: calling request_firmware() from module init will not work with recent/future udev versions
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:43:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F42865A.5060006@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP11iT9K2KcDCJvw_druf5qdNjs0jLfrbpS7CcYh5vXrz_w@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/14/2012 04:25 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We changed udev to strictly enforce sequence order and dependency
> handling of events. This seems to break some netdev drivers which
> block in modprobe until the firmware from userspace is loaded into the
> driver.
Working on the issue complicated the behavior of the driver so I decided
to take a step back to determine the actual issue.
> These are the drivers we received bug reports so far. We didn't look
> into any of details of the drivers, but according to the logs, they
> seem to block for 60 seconds in modprobe, when userspace is not
> behaving like expected:
> bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.1.fw
> rtlwifi/rtl8192sefw.bin
> brcm/bcm43xx-0.fw
The main problem is that the init_module() syscall should not block.
However, the driver I am responsible for (brcm80211) does not request
firmware in the init_module() path. It does that on the probe()
callback. So the problem is that the probe() code path is done in the
context of the init_module() syscall. So the thing to do is decouple the
probe() callback from the init_module() syscall.
One option is using the nowait version of request_firmware(), but
another option I am considering is to defer the driver registration
using a workqueue and schedule it in the init_module() syscall. That way
I think I can avoid having to call the device_unregister_driver() when
firmware loading fails.
Another thing to consider is to change the driver core subsystem and
assure the probe() callback is never done in the init_module() context.
Any opinions?
Gr. AvS
parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <CAPXgP11iT9K2KcDCJvw_druf5qdNjs0jLfrbpS7CcYh5vXrz_w@mail.gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F42865A.5060006@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome