mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Tom Gundersen" <teg@jklm.no>,
	"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: calling request_firmware() from module init will not work with recent/future udev versions
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:43:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F42865A.5060006@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP11iT9K2KcDCJvw_druf5qdNjs0jLfrbpS7CcYh5vXrz_w@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/14/2012 04:25 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We changed udev to strictly enforce sequence order and dependency
> handling of events. This seems to break some netdev drivers which
> block in modprobe until the firmware from userspace is loaded into the
> driver.

Working on the issue complicated the behavior of the driver so I decided 
to take a step back to determine the actual issue.

> These are the drivers we received bug reports so far. We didn't look
> into any of details of the drivers, but according to the logs, they
> seem to block for 60 seconds in modprobe, when userspace is not
> behaving like expected:
>    bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.1.fw
>    rtlwifi/rtl8192sefw.bin
>    brcm/bcm43xx-0.fw

The main problem is that the init_module() syscall should not block. 
However, the driver I am responsible for (brcm80211) does not request 
firmware in the init_module() path. It does that on the probe() 
callback. So the problem is that the probe() code path is done in the 
context of the init_module() syscall. So the thing to do is decouple the 
probe() callback from the init_module() syscall.

One option is using the nowait version of request_firmware(), but 
another option I am considering is to defer the driver registration 
using a workqueue and schedule it in the init_module() syscall. That way 
I think I can avoid having to call the device_unregister_driver() when 
firmware loading fails.

Another thing to consider is to change the driver core subsystem and 
assure the probe() callback is never done in the init_module() context.

Any opinions?

Gr. AvS


           reply	other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <CAPXgP11iT9K2KcDCJvw_druf5qdNjs0jLfrbpS7CcYh5vXrz_w@mail.gmail.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F42865A.5060006@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=teg@jklm.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome