mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <dzickus@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: properly _init-annotate NMI selftest code
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:09:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F478C010200007800074A3D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> (raw)

After all, this code is being run once at boot only (if configured in
at all).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- 3.3-rc4/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ 3.3-rc4-x86-nmi-selftest-init/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
 
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 #include <asm/nmi.h>
@@ -20,35 +21,35 @@
 #define FAILURE		1
 #define TIMEOUT		2
 
-static int nmi_fail;
+static int __initdata nmi_fail;
 
 /* check to see if NMI IPIs work on this machine */
-static DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi_ipi_mask, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi_ipi_mask, NR_CPUS) __initdata;
 
-static int testcase_total;
-static int testcase_successes;
-static int expected_testcase_failures;
-static int unexpected_testcase_failures;
-static int unexpected_testcase_unknowns;
+static int __initdata testcase_total;
+static int __initdata testcase_successes;
+static int __initdata expected_testcase_failures;
+static int __initdata unexpected_testcase_failures;
+static int __initdata unexpected_testcase_unknowns;
 
-static int nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unexpected_testcase_unknowns++;
 	return NMI_HANDLED;
 }
 
-static void init_nmi_testsuite(void)
+static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
 {
 	/* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
 	register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
 }
 
-static void cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
+static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
 {
 	unregister_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, "nmi_selftest_unk");
 }
 
-static int test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int __init test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
         int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
@@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ static int test_nmi_ipi_callback(unsigne
         return NMI_DONE;
 }
 
-static void test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
+static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout;
 
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ static void test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask 
 	return;
 }
 
-static void remote_ipi(void)
+static void __init remote_ipi(void)
 {
 	cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask), cpu_online_mask);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
@@ -94,19 +95,19 @@ static void remote_ipi(void)
 		test_nmi_ipi(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
 }
 
-static void local_ipi(void)
+static void __init local_ipi(void)
 {
 	cpumask_clear(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
 	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
 	test_nmi_ipi(to_cpumask(nmi_ipi_mask));
 }
 
-static void reset_nmi(void)
+static void __init reset_nmi(void)
 {
 	nmi_fail = 0;
 }
 
-static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected)
+static void __init dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected)
 {
 	testcase_fn();
 	/*
@@ -131,12 +132,12 @@ static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(v
 	reset_nmi();
 }
 
-static inline void print_testname(const char *testname)
+static inline void __init print_testname(const char *testname)
 {
 	printk("%12s:", testname);
 }
 
-void nmi_selftest(void)
+void __init nmi_selftest(void)
 {
 	init_nmi_testsuite();
 




             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-24 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-24 12:09 Jan Beulich [this message]
2012-02-24 15:46 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-27  9:38 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Properly " tip-bot for Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F478C010200007800074A3D@nat28.tlf.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®