mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@MIT.EDU>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] time/timekeeping: Simplify vsyscall locking
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:07:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4E859E.9030902@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120228194200.180923135@linutronix.de>

On 02/28/2012 11:46 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> vsyscall updates have a separate seqlock which nests into
> xtime_lock. There is no point to grab another lock for nothing. All it
> needs is to update the seqcount which is user space visible.
> 
> The following series cleans that up.

FWIW, patches 2 and 3 are
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>

Can you let me know when these hit a git tree somewhere?  I have two
more vdso clock speedups I want to send for 3.4, and I'll rebase them on
top of these.

Thanks,
Andy

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-29 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-28 19:46 Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-28 19:46 ` [patch 1/4] time: Remove bogus comments Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-28 19:46 ` [patch 2/4] x86: vdso: Remove bogus locking in update_vsyscall_tz() Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-28 19:46 ` [patch 3/4] x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-28 19:46 ` [patch 4/4] ia64: vsyscall: " Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-26 23:04   ` Tony Luck
2012-03-27 13:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-29 20:07 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F4E859E.9030902@mit.edu \
    --to=luto@mit.edu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®