From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] cgroups: Run subsystem fork callback from cgroup_post_fork()
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:20:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4EEB0F.2000504@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120229162148.GA8375@somewhere.redhat.com>
于 2012年03月01日 00:21, Frederic Weisbecker 写道:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:55:00AM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
>> Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> When a user freezes a cgroup, the freezer sets the subsystem state
>>> to CGROUP_FREEZING and then iterates over the tasks in the cgroup links.
>>>
>>> But there is a possible race here, although unlikely, if a task
>>> forks and the parent is preempted between write_unlock(tasklist_lock)
>>> and cgroup_post_fork(). If we freeze the cgroup while the parent
>>
>> So what if you moved cgroup_post_forks() a few lines up to be
>> inside the tasklist_lock?
>
> It won't work. Consider this scenario:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
>
> cgroup_fork_callbacks()
> write_lock(tasklist_lock)
> try_to_freeze_cgroup() { add child to task list etc...
> cgroup_iter_start()
> freeze tasks
> cgroup_iter_end()
> } cgroup_post_fork()
> write_unlock(tasklist_lock)
>
> If this is not the first time we call cgroup_iter_start(), we won't go
> through the whole tasklist, we simply iterate through the css set task links.
>
> Plus we try to avoid anything under tasklist_lock when possible.
>
Your patch won't close the race I'm afraid.
// state will be set to FREEZING
echo FROZEN > /cgroup/sub/freezer.state
write_lock(tasklist_lock)
add child to task list ...
write_unlock(tasklist_lock)
// state will be updated to FROZEN
cat /cgroup/sub/freezer.state
cgroup_post_fork()
->freezer_fork()
freezer_fork() will freeze the task only if the cgroup is in FREEZING
state, and will BUG if the state is FROZEN.
We can fix freezer_fork(), but seems that requires we hold cgroup_mutex
in that function(), which we don't like at all. Not to say your
task_counter stuff..
At this moment I don't see a solution without tasklist_lock involved,
any better idea?
(I just realized be patch below introduces a tasklist_lock <-> freezer->lock
ABBA deadlock, so it's bad to screw up with tasklist lock)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
index fc0646b..74527ac 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
@@ -278,6 +278,12 @@ static int try_to_freeze_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
struct task_struct *task;
unsigned int num_cant_freeze_now = 0;
+ /*
+ * With this lock held and the check in freezer_fork(), a
+ * half-forked task has no chance to escape from freezing.
+ */
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+
cgroup_iter_start(cgroup, &it);
while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it))) {
if (!freeze_task(task))
@@ -289,6 +295,8 @@ static int try_to_freeze_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
}
cgroup_iter_end(cgroup, &it);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
return num_cant_freeze_now ? -EBUSY : 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index e2cd3e2..2450720 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1328,15 +1328,15 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->group_leader = p;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->thread_group);
+ /* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling! */
+ write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+
/* Now that the task is set up, run cgroup callbacks if
* necessary. We need to run them before the task is visible
* on the tasklist. */
cgroup_fork_callbacks(p);
cgroup_callbacks_done = 1;
- /* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling! */
- write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
-
/* CLONE_PARENT re-uses the old parent */
if (clone_flags & (CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_THREAD)) {
p->real_parent = current->real_parent;
@@ -1393,9 +1393,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
total_forks++;
spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ cgroup_post_fork(p);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
proc_fork_connector(p);
- cgroup_post_fork(p);
if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)
threadgroup_change_end(current);
perf_event_fork(p);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 4:23 [RFC][PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-24 4:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-27 17:02 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-29 15:55 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-02-29 16:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-01 3:20 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2012-03-04 13:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-07 9:22 ` Li Zefan
2012-03-08 15:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4EEB0F.2000504@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome