From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, rni@google.com,
ctalbott@google.com, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: make css->refcnt clearing on cgroup removal optional
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:00:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F77B6BA.4070207@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120330223606.GK28934@google.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, cgroup removal tries to drain all css references. If there
> are active css references, the removal logic waits and retries
> ->pre_detroy() until either all refs drop to zero or removal is
> cancelled.
>
I don't like this either.
> This semantics is unusual and adds non-trivial complexity to cgroup
> core and IMHO is fundamentally misguided in that it couples internal
> implementation details (references to internal data structure) with
> externally visible operation (rmdir). To userland, this is a behavior
> peculiarity which is unnecessary and difficult to expect (css refs is
> otherwise invisible from userland), and, to policy implementations,
> this is an unnecessary restriction (e.g. blkcg wants to hold css refs
> for caching purposes but can't as that becomes visible as rmdir hang).
>
> Unfortunately, memcg currently depends on ->pre_destroy() retrials and
> cgroup removal vetoing and can't be immmediately switched to the new
> behavior. This patch introduces the new behavior of not waiting for
> css refs to drain and maintains the old behavior for subsystems which
> have __DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs set.
>
> Once, memcg is updated, we can drop the code paths for the old
> behavior as proposed in the following patch. Note that the following
> patch is incorrect in that dput work item is in cgroup and may lose
> some of dputs when multiples css's are released back-to-back, and
> __css_put() triggers check_for_release() when refcnt reaches 0 instead
> of 1; however, it shows what part can be removed.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/22559/focus=75251
>
> Note that, in not-too-distant future, cgroup core will start emitting
> warning messages for subsys which require the old behavior, so please
> get moving.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Both patches look good.
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
and I'd like to see code shrink with memcg updates ASAP.
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-01 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-30 22:34 [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: use negative bias on css->refcnt to block css_tryget() Tejun Heo
2012-03-30 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: make css->refcnt clearing on cgroup removal optional Tejun Heo
2012-03-31 21:28 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-01 2:00 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2012-04-01 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-16 22:33 ` Sasha Levin
2012-05-18 17:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 18:28 ` Sasha Levin
2012-05-23 22:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-24 13:21 ` Sasha Levin
2012-05-24 15:41 ` [PATCH] cgroup: superblock can't be released with active dentries Tejun Heo
2012-05-28 0:18 ` Li Zefan
2012-04-01 19:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: make css->refcnt clearing on cgroup removal optional Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F77B6BA.4070207@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome