From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759500Ab2DJVUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:41 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:50908 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754732Ab2DJVUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4F84A40E.8040907@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:20:14 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NeilBrown CC: Jim Kukunas , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: arch/86: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming References: <1334078551-6859-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com> <4F846FBC.9060503@zytor.com> <20120411061442.2f839c77@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <20120411061442.2f839c77@notabene.brown> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/10/2012 01:14 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >> >> I think this (and the SSSE3 patches for RAID-6) should go in via the >> RAID tree. Neil, do you agree? > > I'm happy to take the SSSE3 RAID-6 patches as they only affect lib/raid6, but > I felt that this one - being purely in arch/x86 - should probably go via the > x86 tree. > However I'm flexible and if you (collectively) are happy with these patches > going in through my tree, I'll do that. > Go ahead and take them with my Acked-by: -- I think that's easier. -hpa