mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ftrace/x86: Have arch x86_64 use breakpoints instead of stop machine
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:43:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9926E2.4010100@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120425184930.873468066@goodmis.org>

(2012/04/26 3:48), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
> 
> This method changes x86 to add a breakpoint to the mcount locations
> instead of calling stop machine.
> 
> Now that iret can be handled by NMIs, we perform the following to
> update code:
> 
> 1) Add a breakpoint to all locations that will be modified
> 
> 2) Sync all cores
> 
> 3) Update all locations to be either a nop or call (except breakpoint
>    op)
> 
> 4) Sync all cores
> 
> 5) Remove the breakpoint with the new code.
> 
> 6) Sync all cores
> 
> [
>   Added updates that Masami suggested:
>    Use unlikely(modifying_ftrace_code) in int3 trap to keep kprobes efficient.
>    Don't use NOTIFY_* in ftrace handler in int3 as it is not a notifier.
> ]

I just have a few comments :)

[...]
> +int modifying_ftrace_code __read_mostly;
> +
> +/*
> + * A breakpoint was added to the code address we are about to
> + * modify, and this is the handle that will just skip over it.
> + * We are either changing a nop into a trace call, or a trace
> + * call to a nop. While the change is taking place, we treat
> + * it just like it was a nop.
> + */
> +int ftrace_int3_handler(int cmd, const char *str,
> +		 struct pt_regs *regs, long err, int trap, int sig)
> +{
> +	if (!modifying_ftrace_code || cmd != DIE_INT3 || !regs)
> +		return 0;
> +

At this moment, all of these checks are meaningless, because
this is not a handler but just a fixup code in int3 isr. :)
So, I think you can just define "int ftrace_int3_fixup(regs)"
for this purpose.

> +	if (!ftrace_location(regs->ip - 1))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	regs->ip += MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE - 1;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index ff9281f1..1712485 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/debugreg.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm/ftrace.h>
>  #include <asm/traps.h>
>  #include <asm/desc.h>
>  #include <asm/i387.h>
> @@ -303,8 +304,14 @@ gp_in_kernel:
>  }
>  
>  /* May run on IST stack. */
> -dotraplinkage void __kprobes do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> +dotraplinkage void __kprobes notrace do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER

I guess CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE ?

> +	/* ftrace must be first, everything else may cause a recursive crash */
> +	if (unlikely(modifying_ftrace_code) &&
> +	    ftrace_int3_handler(DIE_INT3, "int3", regs, error_code, 3, SIGTRAP))
> +		return;
> +#endif

Thank you!

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-25 18:48 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] tracing: updates for 3.5 Steven Rostedt
2012-04-25 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] tracing: Add percpu buffers for trace_printk() Steven Rostedt
2012-04-25 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] tracing: Remove an unneeded check in trace_seq_buffer() Steven Rostedt
2012-04-25 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] ring-buffer: Add per_cpu ring buffer control files Steven Rostedt
2012-04-25 18:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] ftrace/x86: Have arch x86_64 use breakpoints instead of stop machine Steven Rostedt
2012-04-26 10:43   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2012-04-26 12:13     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-25 18:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace/x86: Remove the complex ftrace NMI handling code Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9926E2.4010100@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome