From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@gentwo.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, avi@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
ying.huang@intel.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
jeremy@goop.org
Subject: Re: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 09:09:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA47DCD.8000801@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504142926.a930ba90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 05/05/2012 05:29 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800
> Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend
>> for correct this. Please reply this resend email.
>>
>> ---------------
>> Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for
>> potential bisection convenience.
>>
>> Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace
>> patches and final dead code clean up patch.
>>
>> The net, xen and x86 part code are independent.
>>
>> After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code
>> do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch
>> at that time.
>>
>> Any further comments are appreciated!
>>
>
> I'm still sitting on these patches. The review was a bit inconclusive
> and confusing and everyone will have forgotten all about everything. I
> think I'll drop them and ask for a resend, please.
>
> Be sure to update the changelogs so that they address everything which
> was discussed last time - so we don't end up covering the same ground.
> Please also Cc everyone who was involved in the discussion last time.
>
Thanks for comments. I will try to refresh this upon mm tree next week.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-05 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-13 15:53 Alex Shi
2012-01-13 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs Alex Shi
2012-01-13 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xen: " Alex Shi
2012-01-13 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86: " Alex Shi
2012-01-13 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86: change percpu_read_stable to this_cpu_read_stable Alex Shi
2012-01-13 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions Alex Shi
2012-05-04 21:29 ` [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions Andrew Morton
2012-05-05 1:09 ` Alex Shi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-13 15:45 Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA47DCD.8000801@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome