From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spinlock_debug: Print kallsyms name for lock
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:53:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAC0EC1.7050803@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424145402.4f9be035.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 04/24/12 14:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:17:03 -0700
> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> On 04/23/12 14:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> --- a/lib/spinlock_debug.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/spinlock_debug.c
>>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void spin_dump(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *msg)
>>>> printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: spinlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d\n",
>>>> msg, raw_smp_processor_id(),
>>>> current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
>>>> - printk(KERN_EMERG " lock: %p, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/%d, "
>>>> + printk(KERN_EMERG " lock: %ps, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/%d, "
>>>> ".owner_cpu: %d\n",
>>>> lock, lock->magic,
>>>> owner ? owner->comm : "<none>",
>>> Maybe. It will only do useful things for statically-allocated locks
>>> which are rare and which we are unlikely to screw up as easily as locks
>>> which lie in dynamically allocated memory.
>> Agreed. It catches the really stupid stuff and that's about it. I was
>> thinking we could get more information about dynamic allocated locks by
>> adding some code to slab to find the slab that a pointer is allocated
>> in. Does that sound possible?
> Well lockdep knows lots of things about the lock, including numerous
> stack backtraces which can be used to identify the lock. Making
> spinlock_debug use lockdep infrastructure seems a good fit.
>
I was thinking about this more. In the case of spinlock bad magic I want
to find out who freed this region of memory last because that code most
likely stomped all over my lock and corrupted the magic. With lockdep I
can't find that. I can only find out that the allocator of a lock did a
lock/unlock after a kfree() and I believe lockdep already checks to make
sure live locks are not being freed.
Enabling slub debugging might help, but I would have to get lucky and
allocate the lock after the previous user corrupted it. So I really want
a way to query slab/slub about who last allocated and free this memory
so I can find them when I detect magic corruption.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 21:45 [PATCH 1/2] vsprintf: Fix %ps on non symbols when using kallsyms Stephen Boyd
2012-04-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] spinlock_debug: Print kallsyms name for lock Stephen Boyd
2012-04-23 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-24 3:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-24 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-10 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-04-23 21:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] vsprintf: Fix %ps on non symbols when using kallsyms Andrew Morton
2012-07-26 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAC0EC1.7050803@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome