mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 4/6] time: introduce leap second functional interface
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:24:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBAA499.1070905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120521191844.GC19812@netboy.at.omicron.at>

On 05/21/2012 12:18 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 05/18/2012 07:09 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> +
>>> +int timekeeping_gettod_status(struct timespec *ts, time_t *offset);
>>> +
>>> +void timekeeping_delete_leap_second(void);
>>> +
>>> +void timekeeping_finish_leap_second(void);
>>> +
>>> +void timekeeping_insert_leap_second(void);
>>> +
>>> +#endif
>> Why not just add these to time.h?
> This is a private interface only for ntp.c, not for the whole rest of
> the kernel via time.h.
Hrm.  I prefer to keep things fairly flat (even having time.h and 
timex.h bugs me somewhat).  But having such a separation could be 
useful, but maybe at a slightly more coarse level. Something like 
timekeeping-internal.h and time.h, splitting all the general accessors 
away from the non-general.

I just don't want to have a ton of stray .h files, but maybe I'm 
prematurely worrying about it.

> BTW this highlights the very icky incestuous relationship between
> ntp.c and timekeeper.c. Probably there should be a comment documenting
> the (unspoken) locking sequence for ntp_lock and timekeeper.lock.
>
The locking order is pretty straight forward: timekeeper.lock -> 
ntp_lock.   This only gets messy when you require timekeeping data from 
the ntp context, but usually we provide the required data via the 
caller.  But better documentation is always welcome.

thanks
-john


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-21 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18 14:09 [PATCH RFC V2 0/6] Fix leap seconds and add tai clock Richard Cochran
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 1/6] time: remove obsolete declaration Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 23:57   ` John Stultz
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 2/6] ntp: remove useless parameter Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 23:58   ` John Stultz
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 3/6] time: keep track of the pending utc/tai threshold Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 18:09   ` John Stultz
2012-05-21 19:08     ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-22 17:39       ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-22 18:06         ` John Stultz
2012-05-23  8:29           ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-23 16:50             ` John Stultz
2012-05-23 19:17               ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-23 20:18                 ` John Stultz
2012-05-24  6:43                   ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-24  6:57                     ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-26 15:07                       ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-30  1:46                       ` John Stultz
2012-05-30  1:49                         ` John Stultz
2012-05-30  5:11                           ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-30  5:56                             ` John Stultz
2012-05-30  6:19                               ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-30  6:23                                 ` John Stultz
2012-05-30  7:27                                   ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-23 19:42               ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 18:21   ` John Stultz
2012-05-21 19:13     ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 4/6] time: introduce leap second functional interface Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 18:01   ` John Stultz
2012-05-21 19:18     ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 20:24       ` John Stultz [this message]
2012-05-22  4:25         ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-22 15:10           ` John Stultz
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 5/6] time: move leap second management into time keeping core Richard Cochran
2012-05-21 18:18   ` John Stultz
2012-05-21 19:24     ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-18 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC V2 6/6] time: Add CLOCK_TAI clockid Richard Cochran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBAA499.1070905@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome