From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pidns: guarantee that the pidns init will be the last pidns process reaped
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:32:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC748D3.8050606@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530181500.GA20130@redhat.com>
On 05/30/2012 10:15 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Today we have a two-fold bug. Sometimes release_task on pid == 1 in a
> pid namespace can run before other processes in a pid namespace have had
> release task called. With the result that pid_ns_release_proc can be
> called before the last proc_flus_task() is done using
> upid->ns->proc_mnt, resulting in the use of a stale pointer. This same
> set of circumstances can lead to waitpid(...) returning for a processes
> started with clone(CLONE_NEWPID) before the every process in the pid
> namespace has actually exited.
>
> To fix this modify zap_pid_ns_processess wait until all other processes
> in the pid namespace have exited, even EXIT_DEAD zombies.
>
> The delay_group_leader and related tests ensure that the thread gruop
> leader will be the last thread of a process group to be reaped, or to
> become EXIT_DEAD and self reap. With the change to zap_pid_ns_processes
> we get the guarantee that pid == 1 in a pid namespace will be the last
> task that release_task is called on.
>
> With pid == 1 being the last task to pass through release_task
> pid_ns_release_proc can no longer be called too early nor can wait
> return before all of the EXIT_DEAD tasks in a pid namespace have exited.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120530175745.GA19327@redhat.com>
2012-05-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] pidns: premature pid_ns_release_proc() fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] pidns: guarantee that the pidns init will be the last pidns process reaped Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-31 10:32 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2012-06-13 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-13 22:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-14 17:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: find_new_reaper() can no longer switch to init_pid_ns.child_reaper Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-31 10:33 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC748D3.8050606@parallels.com \
--to=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.rilling@kerlabs.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome