mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: enable MMC_CAP_DONE_COMPLETE
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:28:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a1867dc-7bcd-4c63-bdbd-a533043cd91e@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1791876245-190981-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

On 13.10.2026 09:24, Shawn Lin wrote:
> All requests issued by dw_mmc are completed from dw_mci_work_func(),
> which runs from the system_bh_wq workqueue. It is therefore preemptible
> context and host->lock is dropped before the completion, see
> mmc_request_done() in dw_mci_request_end().
>
> The dw_mci_interrupt and the dw_mci_watchdog_fn never call mmc_request_done()
> directly. So every request is completed from a sleepable context with no
> spinlock held.
>
> This is exactly the contract required by MMC_CAP_DONE_COMPLETE, which was
> introduced for hosts that can complete requests within mmc_request_done()
> without deferring to the core's complete_work.
>
> Without the flag, the core records the finished request in
> mq->complete_req and queues mq->complete_work, i.e. a second workqueue
> dispatch plus an extra context switch per request. With the flag,
> mmc_blk_mq_req_done() completes the request directly via
> mmc_blk_mq_post_req() -> blk_mq_complete_request(), and a following
> request completes the previous one inline from mmc_blk_rw_wait().
>
> Measured on an RK3576 SD card (dw_mmc) with:
>
>   perf record -a -g -F 999 -- sleep 30
>   perf report --stdio -g graph,0.5,caller
>
> fio: 4k randread, ioengine=libaio
>
> Without the flag, the completion hot path is:
>
>   mmc_request_done -> mmc_blk_mq_req_done -> queue_work_on      (~4.3%)
>   ... -> mmc_blk_mq_complete_work            (kworker/5:1H-mm, ~18.4%)
>        -> mmc_blk_mq_complete_prev_req -> mmc_blk_mq_post_req
>
> with the flag the workqueue round trip disappears completely: there is no
> queue_work_on and no mmc_blk_mq_complete_work in the profile anymore, and
> the previous request is completed inline:
>
>   mmc_blk_mq_issue_rq -> mmc_blk_mq_post_req -> mmc_blk_mq_complete_rq
>                                                   -> __blk_mq_end_request
>
> This can remove a redundant workqueue dispatch and context switch per completed
> request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>


This patch landed yesterday in linux-next as commit 80636b762eec ("mmc: dw_mmc:
enable MMC_CAP_DONE_COMPLETE"). In my tests I found that it causes serious
problems. I found that it is responsible for corrupting root filesystem and/or
journal.
Reverting this on top of linux-next fixes the issue. Unfortunately I didn't find
what mmc access pattern causes the corruption, but running my tests and rebooting
boards 2 or 3 times usually ended in breaking it.


There must some corner case missed in the analysis behind this patch.



> ---
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index ff0b25d..bec777b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -2945,6 +2945,8 @@ static int dw_mci_init_host_caps(struct dw_mci *host)
>  	if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ)
>  		mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD;
>  
> +	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DONE_COMPLETE;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13  7:24 Shawn Lin
2026-10-28 17:16 ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found] ` <CGME20261110192834eucas1p1e183345528f097cb64340f36a03e4b14@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2026-11-10 19:28   ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a1867dc-7bcd-4c63-bdbd-a533043cd91e@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®