From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
haotian.wang@sifive.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
zhi.a.wang@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
freude@linux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, idos@mellanox.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com,
christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:36:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a34d071-2e78-c37c-1046-7f9f6bb9e67f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018153042.3516cde1.cohuck@redhat.com>
On 2019/10/18 下午9:30, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:55:02 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2019/10/18 下午5:46, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:48:34 +0800
>>> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> + * @get_vendor_id: Get virtio vendor id
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * Returns u32: virtio vendor id
>>> How is the vendor id defined? As for normal virtio-pci devices?
>>
>> The vendor that provides this device. So something like this
>>
>> I notice that MMIO also had this so it looks to me it's not pci specific.
> Ok. Would be good to specify this more explicitly.
Ok.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + * @get_status: Get the device status
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * Returns u8: virtio device status
>>>> + * @set_status: Set the device status
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * @status: virtio device status
>>>> + * @get_config: Read from device specific configuration space
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of
>>>> + * configuration space
>>>> + * @buf: buffer used to read to
>>>> + * @len: the length to read from
>>>> + * configration space
>>>> + * @set_config: Write to device specific configuration space
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of
>>>> + * configuration space
>>>> + * @buf: buffer used to write from
>>>> + * @len: the length to write to
>>>> + * configration space
>>>> + * @get_mdev_features: Get the feature of virtio mdev device
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * Returns the mdev features (API) support by
>>>> + * the device.
>>> What kind of 'features' are supposed to go in there? Are these bits,
>>> like you defined for VIRTIO_MDEV_F_VERSION_1 above?
>>
>> It's the API or mdev features other than virtio features. It could be
>> used by driver to determine the capability of the mdev device. Besides
>> _F_VERSION_1, we may add dirty page tracking etc which means we need new
>> device ops.
> Ok, so that's supposed to be distinct bits that can be or'ed together?
Yes.
> Makes sense, but probably needs some more documentation somewhere.
Let me add some doc above this helper.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + * @get_generation: Get device generaton
>>>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>>>> + * Returns u32: device generation
>>> Is that callback mandatory?
>>
>> I think so, it's hard to emulate that completely in virtio-mdev transport.
> IIRC, the generation stuff is not mandatory in the current version of
> virtio, as not all transports have that concept.
It looks to me we can have workaround as what has been done by virtio.c.
Return 0 if this helper is not provided.
>
> Generally, are any of the callbacks optional, or are all of them
> mandatory? From what I understand, you plan to add new things that
> depend on features... would that mean non-mandatory callbacks?
Yes, not all of them were mandatory, I will explicit explain which are
mandatory and which are not.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 10:48 [PATCH V4 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 1/6] mdev: class id support Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:25 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 2/6] modpost: add support for mdev class id Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:25 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops Jason Wang
2019-10-17 15:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-17 17:53 ` Alex Williamson
2019-10-18 7:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 7:34 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:41 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-21 6:02 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops Jason Wang
2019-10-17 17:53 ` Alex Williamson
2019-10-18 7:35 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-18 9:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 10:55 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-18 13:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 5:36 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-10-18 9:46 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-18 10:57 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 5/6] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport Jason Wang
2019-10-18 14:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 5:59 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21 9:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 10:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 6/6] docs: sample driver to demonstrate how to implement virtio-mdev framework Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a34d071-2e78-c37c-1046-7f9f6bb9e67f@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=haotian.wang@sifive.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=idos@mellanox.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®