From: duoming@zju.edu.cn
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstultz@google.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timers: fix synchronization rules in comments of del_timer_sync
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:02:18 +0800 (GMT+08:00) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a6d3b57.7607e.182801fb63f.Coremail.duoming@zju.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877d3irfze.ffs@tglx>
Hello,
On Mon, 08 Aug 2022 16:01:57 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01 2022 at 16:55, Duoming Zhou wrote:
> > - * Synchronization rules: Callers must prevent restarting of the timer,
> > - * otherwise this function is meaningless. It must not be called from
> > - * interrupt contexts unless the timer is an irqsafe one. The caller must
> > - * not hold locks which would prevent completion of the timer's
> > - * handler. The timer's handler must not call add_timer_on(). Upon exit the
> > - * timer is not queued and the handler is not running on any CPU.
> > + * Synchronization rules: Callers must prevent restarting of the timer in
> > + * other places except for the timer's handler, otherwise this function is
> > + * meaningless. It must not be called from interrupt contexts unless the
> > + * timer is an irqsafe one. The caller must not hold locks which would
> > + * prevent completion of the timer's handler. The timer's handler must
> > + * not call add_timer_on().
>
> If we are making this correct: What's so special about add_timer_on()?
The del_timer_sync() could also stop add_timer_on(), there is nothing special
about add_timer_on(). I think change the annotation to the following is better.
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 717fcb9fb14..dd623018dbc 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1375,11 +1375,11 @@ static inline void del_timer_wait_running(struct timer_list *timer) { }
* CPUs.
*
* Synchronization rules: Callers must prevent restarting of the timer,
- * otherwise this function is meaningless. It must not be called from
- * interrupt contexts unless the timer is an irqsafe one. The caller must
- * not hold locks which would prevent completion of the timer's
- * handler. The timer's handler must not call add_timer_on(). Upon exit the
- * timer is not queued and the handler is not running on any CPU.
+ * otherwise this function is meaningless. It could also stop periodic timer.
+ * It must not be called from interrupt contexts unless the timer is an irqsafe
+ * one. The caller must not hold locks which would prevent completion of the
+ * timer's handler. Upon exit the timer is not queued and the handler is not
+ * running on any CPU.
Best regards,
Duoming Zhou
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 8:55 Duoming Zhou
2022-07-02 1:47 ` duoming
2022-08-08 14:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-09 1:02 ` duoming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a6d3b57.7607e.182801fb63f.Coremail.duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--to=duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®