From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from msa.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-80.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B8481AB7; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 20:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.12.242.80 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712952929; cv=none; b=bZy1Fz9tr1pSP2AJcP9zQhdFSalecnSj6yPkdb/hZZt8yZVElx82W37k6+C5HvHsJhFiYecQ7Jh+Ps/uWXItDf8Q/9z2G6KcuDi/PXsMjkjLDlwc6MG6kVhHua7eRa+LlVEeePnwABRU18e4fXMCHS3nRkv0IAY3O770bLJ6UQ8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712952929; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6OFA7cWcEyUeumLiWhHnXohN0adeqOCPkM0RvDd/r8U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mVL5esFY8Z/fL6E1R7F2VIUZ/udxoKILQE8daBmUW++zqK9/xJ5ngaFcAMPEZegSYP4mbhgZGuKsYD+Le28ZOZQ9+/2JjvTdzGEJ3u0hcaJFLB/BHDb0fOUf2ek5aS2ZlS7A8twPO7ZnKI07aWxQmG9HnL4bmxFV4F4hQqRSER0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wanadoo.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wanadoo.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wanadoo.fr header.i=@wanadoo.fr header.b=Y/HjXqXR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.12.242.80 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wanadoo.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wanadoo.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wanadoo.fr header.i=@wanadoo.fr header.b="Y/HjXqXR" Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([86.243.17.157]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id vNIorQIXBdtohvNIprHg9H; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:15:19 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wanadoo.fr; s=t20230301; t=1712952919; bh=4sRdJoptdfoPL7zAVvsibhZop6qjPpz+hJEcj3lsn3w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Y/HjXqXR7FoLagZHkZ10qYS+LtNZegzA+lFjY/H173NA5M9EXomTX/mAd95f5Jjxv yZbKZiyJYKaMSIEHZTEiaeKHM19PWMmVhVUyn4isBSJtb83Y2fW2oP6d0rm7tLdp7Z 9u5QIRNdj14tY15TSTpHilC0y05AlRh8do8eeonDrq0UYff/pwcddixtnITkNCqJxU 84VJsB4TxC+4odWceNRtnSle2ZkuBsTD82DPOWVxjBpWS68gZ6ozS0dowCSEJr7zoP zbdXB+AGFkn9CHpcUDfWVTGivt43RJoL9pa3COoD3Nv+y7vErFyoGO4Vl+fmoMFsyb Ckv+OKAEpf0+g== X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.18] X-ME-Auth: Y2hyaXN0b3BoZS5qYWlsbGV0QHdhbmFkb28uZnI= X-ME-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:15:19 +0200 X-ME-IP: 86.243.17.157 Message-ID: <4a85997b-77a1-4c19-81d6-0e6cb59e7c5c@wanadoo.fr> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:15:14 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: *** SPAM *** Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/175] 4.19.312-rc1 review To: Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, maco@android.com, tglx@linutronix.de, sean.anderson@linux.dev References: <20240411095419.532012976@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Language: en-MW From: Marion & Christophe JAILLET In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 12/04/2024 à 21:46, Pavel Machek a écrit : >> Christophe JAILLET >> slimbus: core: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API > AFAICT this is just a cleanup. We should not need this. > Not exactly. As stated in the commit: "this change allows one more device. Previously address 0xFE was never used." I don't use slimbus, so I'll let people with more knowledge than me about this driver decide if it should be backported or not, but from my point of view, it is a valid fix. But, unless s.o. complained that this extra device address was needed in a RL scenario, I would say that the patch should not be backported, because: "better safe than sorry". CJ