Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)

["Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Sat, April 23, 2011 11:29 pm, Arvind R wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>> On 04/23/11 01:21, Arvind R wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:20:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20110420:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on i386:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too
>>>> large for 'unsigned long' type
>
>> I think that the goal should be to get your 4-patch series merged.
>>
>>> That would still not fix the wrong error-info reported by the driver -
>>> this is
>>> fixed by the patch-set titled '[RFC PATCH 2.6.37 0/4] i3000_edac :
>>> merge
>>> i82975x support' dated 2011-02-14 in the linux-edac archives.
>>>
>>> Please advise on getting the patch into main-stream. The I3000 is a
>>> re-labeled
>>> i82975x (or vice-versa). Hence the patch-set to merge the drivers. If
>>> separate
>>> i82975x driver is needed - I can provide the patch. The reported bug is
>>> not
>>> present in the merge-patched driver.
>>
>> Doug, any plans to merge this 4-patch series from Arvind?
>>
>> Arvind, was bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net copied on this patch
>> series?
> No - thought that the bluesmoke-list had moved to linux-edac.
>

If bluesmoke-devel is obsolete, the MAINTAINERS file
needs to be updated.

>>
>> and was the I3000 driver maintainer copied?  (added)
>> I can't tell this from the marc.info archives.
> Added myself to the driver maintainer in the i3000_edac.c file. The
> patch-set adds support for i82975x in the i3000 driver, which is
> better structured.
> TODO:
>     1. Change Kconfig file - select I3000 for i82975x support
>     2. Delete i82975x_edac.c file
>     3. Update MAINTAINERS file

Did the other EDAC-I3000 maintainer respond?

thanks,
-- 
~Randy