mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:08:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ad8719c-1476-3226-e426-a171b46ca568@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4=wcWv4P_M8kQDjB=QfT5N+mFKm0mUdSDjGSgLg=pRGSw@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/20/21 7:15 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
>>> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
>>> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
>>> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
>>> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
>>> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
>>>
>>> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>
> 
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> If there are no outstanding concerns, can you please apply this one?
> Would be nice to see it in v5.17 if that's possible.
> 

I added the patch to my watchdog-next tree, but Wim handles all pull
requests.

Thanks,
Guenter



  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-12 17:02 Sam Protsenko
2021-12-12 17:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-12 17:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-20 15:15   ` Sam Protsenko
2021-12-20 21:08     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-12-21 11:52       ` Sam Protsenko
2021-12-21 15:05         ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ad8719c-1476-3226-e426-a171b46ca568@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®