From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] intel: Remove redundant ternary operators
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 15:42:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ae309b5-e840-4db2-bc33-2cb53209d32c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827121249.493203-1-liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
On 8/27/25 14:12, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
> For ternary operators in the form of "a ? true : false", if 'a' itself
> returns a boolean result, the ternary operator can be omitted. Remove
> redundant ternary operators to clean up the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
Netdev discourages patches which perform simple clean-ups, which are not
in the context of other work
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#clean-up-patches
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_phy.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
> index cd65008c7ef5..c21cd6311f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c
> @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ s32 igb_phy_has_link(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
> udelay(usec_interval);
> }
>
> - *success = (i < iterations) ? true : false;
> + *success = i < iterations;
>
> return ret_val;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_phy.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_phy.c
> index 6c4d204aecfa..828884d76f04 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_phy.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ s32 igc_phy_has_link(struct igc_hw *hw, u32 iterations,
> udelay(usec_interval);
> }
>
> - *success = (i < iterations) ? true : false;
> + *success = i < iterations;
>
> return ret_val;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-27 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 12:12 Liao Yuanhong
2025-08-27 13:42 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ae309b5-e840-4db2-bc33-2cb53209d32c@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®