From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yx1-f48.google.com (mail-yx1-f48.google.com [74.125.224.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0A542E8D6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.224.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788276313; cv=none; b=a1kWn1DWXOvsKbAPYhHsOPQZ7sDe9Qoli2owdwH09cSt1ZQAgWIg+VDp+REaErh/5wlBUqUjjD8cfaNfoJqYgtbWsprCBlDGAs7UTT/61GppH/HmNZWJWbJLVohHX5TMunoJukvM9xAX2JaU5athIUT/z/qPwPkts3aUTzDZs5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788276313; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Chu1zqafqw5vyPQ1Qf0Z8VOF1X0ivxEKmuLK/WHS/wc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YwMaQbncewAYYwVJhCHDzAxI/WhKSgJOd8dGbzjk7hiQ+GsnhFf5o0hFDfgbc2Ck2R7yzg1b3TxxvULJL8OE2nm8eF17BQEpuylh4I4iPRqSy3gRJcE5h0eGZG6shGCDjC65UYX55PSk7jsoc+J23lL4zH5pTrw/hyf7Vf3tUEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=riscstar.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riscstar.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=riscstar-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@riscstar-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b=J/1G6CvB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.224.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=riscstar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riscstar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=riscstar-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@riscstar-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b="J/1G6CvB" Received: by mail-yx1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 956f58d0204a3-66e5d39cfe1so2902574d50.3 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=riscstar-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1788276311; x=1788881111; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=pesZZ392npsph2E6XlluJo4xVrgKZ8m8f+DaY98EXWU=; b=J/1G6CvBb8wST7+0zW8Hfrsx1Ll8/qLBcc6yop+xmXwu/v060quRjVBg0d4ALws4o0 VLOi9Kv8NDfmpLcjtNuTzOiE2LeiQc+pfQN482tdjeFH8SejPV4akTD+0uwHozFPacBl xr3UP5I4lw9tSME4oIQsuf6d/9OQhVlw4zUpCsWqvVjotR+RZssGXhqzLFY+cgidcRgG aUSfJ4fElG1maBpmKJXXs4I/3gRacxH5ftY/nONNI9oOnfJVfT2tEmam/bYuEPfKbNnF 1eN8mS/pNIWc1moX/Jn1+kKZbMVxh7kEwV/axBEtRuPIjN1URLf0KoJlRTS0MlQnJGVX +M7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1788276311; x=1788881111; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=pesZZ392npsph2E6XlluJo4xVrgKZ8m8f+DaY98EXWU=; b=p+rlKjZLR6ubIQdnIhxfaBLoap1pX24ID0ix9MP11hRxgrcPDN7SPw9WZRF9xvGu62 hhZIApCyOO1StT7nrLrTumikIihp5AA/tnpmylNeRZzYcVxjN6iPscrM3+bPkkoXeHaj dKQ4LkNbpQMiCZINq2E3G8R0wgwdmeRnSmyaEYacgI8o96KWTwynFKR3RWeLSNYRgkqM qKOhuUkVuDtX23JwHKNM+RaTNgEAyYwCTFyg8muRCPGh1MBFkprMgDHWYU2kVyxvKNwc svpYt14WhedBRZT90z2EvQZ9UWF32Dd2puH1Jkp0YXw3Ahyj2E4YnKg/+loznXie0B3S +65A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvByhy11LkwHsztaxM6QdBbH9VKZhKScpzZcz33u2acRnVDEAWkPWIBaE0pZtqFHctFxR8N1WB1WBq6d2JmQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++m6TvKTOXX95U2BIZRJzJP2wvJZ5CDWeJ/y9ebP78MKSLvtd85d Fy/BqfhTWw09lWq/RP47IvB+BbiOQGceFsDsn9RbNYCCYfqequI7VSXaeBZm//+bTmI= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0kebLCbP95LZGQpXbDGrfOTtyr/BPtrNl3JqE2x8zKjUoW4rzBTMySHvhuiSN 3LHFpTMkToqZv46Xj/FgAAsunIe+EudDTKV4+4IZ7sCBkYQ3yS9qIz8rPznpUkSsf9SB6ix5ndr NFXoodsEkXQoi1bjNPSLec5OPKFhDIJtuKkGZEXerYhFfLR6pwCyMi5mhbMcmvRoxzk6qu5BNvf f496hU6dD6xZ6qr/Nn582UgXkl6UsrQdHfSB3UeQQODnawFr5kDsgvQ6CQ6UVvOg6L4rwUMRaKF CjOsAcso9Y7ovmm5pF20xjfCiQPG5bnbw7Vs8+d7e004J8qzGoVBJS4mlceELcFYWhfiEHyNXLX 9m82H+khkUBDqQMb7cam9fhBM2HNU3+uxk+b6x1zI98atYOcpGyyOcS+phu2teN0PsW6hctVFiq lYHpEsOWfV9gGNNw1JzDks61aZA7tpNwU+yfADNYlwRNOG8QhwH7fZDC3MxRTH X-Received: by 2002:a05:690e:24a:b0:669:4df9:7c68 with SMTP id 956f58d0204a3-66e4c74e84bmr7637535d50.36.1788276311159; Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.22.22.28] ([73.62.185.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 956f58d0204a3-66e4ed1fbebsm8638344d50.17.2026.09.01.08.25.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4af0088a-13ca-4eda-9147-c7aaba316690@riscstar.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:25:06 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] of: address: kill of_node_is_pcie() To: Herve Codina Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, daniel@riscstar.com, mohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com, lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260901011338.1323243-1-elder@riscstar.com> <20260901011338.1323243-5-elder@riscstar.com> <20260901084546.424c6ef2@bootlin.com> <6a5bec41-71ef-4d9c-a34f-77d166b15ca6@riscstar.com> <20260901171528.487ca48d@bootlin.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20260901171528.487ca48d@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/1/26 10:15 AM, Herve Codina wrote: >>> The warning here was printed based on the node name whereas of_node_is_pcie() >>> prints the message based on the 'device_type' property of a pci_dev node. >> You're right. Both warnings were getting reported for me, but for >> different reasons. >> >> I would be happy to just drop this patch and live with two warnings >> in some cases (we should rarely see either one of them anyway, right?). >> >> Is that OK with you? Does anyone feel this patch should be kept? > On my side, I have no problem to see two warnings and so, IHMO, this patch > can be dropped. Unless I hear otherwise, that's what I will do, for v4, which I'll send out sometime this week after addressing concerns pointed out by Sashiko. Thank you. -Alex