From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
brauner@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, gkwang@linx-info.com,
jannh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
p1ucky0923@gmail.com, ryncsn@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
sj@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, zijing.zhang@proton.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: add test for (BATCH_PROCESS)MADV_DONTNEED
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:39:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4af59ef8-bbea-48f7-a207-8a92284fc34d@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6CC829BF-E6B3-4115-9256-11248BB39F51@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:36:48PM +0800, wang lian wrote:
> I deeply appreciate for your criticism. This is my first patch and I will improve it based on what we have discussed so far.
Sorry if it seemed harsh, I appreciate the first patch can be difficult (I
still remember mine!) but hopefully it's clear the focus is on getting
things right technically and this is all :)
Overall I think something more like a generalised test of process_madvise()
behaviour would be most valuable, as David suggested?
Thanks, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 14:36 wang lian
2025-06-23 14:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-06-24 10:46 ` [PATCH] selftests: add basic test for MADV_POPULATE_(READ|WRITE) wang lian
2025-06-28 11:39 ` [PATCH] selftests/mm: Add process_madvise() tests wang lian
2025-06-30 13:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-21 13:30 [PATCH] selftests/mm: add test for (BATCH_PROCESS)MADV_DONTNEED wang lian
2025-06-23 12:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-23 13:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-23 13:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4af59ef8-bbea-48f7-a207-8a92284fc34d@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gkwang@linx-info.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=p1ucky0923@gmail.com \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zijing.zhang@proton.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®