From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cuse: wait for pending RCU callbacks on module exit
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:59:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0dc107-f9fa-4e84-9a6e-f1fef12d56c9@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvKQrOGAFCDidFeELrQb08sebJVo=WHXB5SoWAwjodSKA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Miklos,
On 2026/8/18 15:33, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 at 15:40, Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> Since commit 053fc4f755ad ("fuse: fix UAF in rcu pathwalks"),
>> fuse_conn_put() frees the fuse_conn through call_rcu() rather than
>> synchronously. For cuse, fc->release is cuse_fc_release(), which
>> lives in the cuse module. If the module is removed before the RCU
>> grace period ends, the callback jumps into freed module memory:
> free_module() calls synchronize_rcu(), so this should not be an issue.
synchronize_rcu() only waits for pre-existing RCU read-side critical
sections to complete. It does not wait for pending call_rcu() callbacks
to execute. The callback can still be queued when module text is freed.
The rcu_barrier() is needed to flush them.
Many modules (including fuse itself) already call rcu_barrier() on exit
for exactly this reason. Documentation/RCU/rcubarrier.rst also explicitly
states that synchronize_rcu() does not wait for callbacks and cannot
replace rcu_barrier().
Thanks,
Baokun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 13:40 Baokun Li
2026-08-18 7:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-08-18 7:59 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2026-08-18 8:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b0dc107-f9fa-4e84-9a6e-f1fef12d56c9@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®