mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>,
	 Angela Czubak <aczubak@google.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] HID: haptic: Get rid of input_ff_destroy() in error paths
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 23:48:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b1d3cd7d5d6ef4029285d0a7ddb79be7b7fd131.camel@rong.moe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f44447354f28c295e79a025bbcab7a4e@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, 2026-11-12 at 21:50 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Rong,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 01:53:55AM +0800, Rong Zhang wrote:
> > It's painful to have error paths after calling input_ff_create(),
> > because input_ff_destroy() frees too much things but does not restore
> > some other things.
> > 
> > On get_device failure, the module's bail-out path calls module_put()
> > right before hid_haptic_destroy() calling it again, causing refcount
> > underflow.
> > 
> > Besides, every error path calling input_ff_destroy() frees ff->private,
> > while the others don't. This divergence has caused quite a lot of
> > trouble.
> > 
> > Get the module and the device beforehand, so that there is no error path
> > after input_ff_create(), eliminating the call to input_ff_destroy(). In
> > this manner, we don't need to restore dev->flush and dev->event either.
> 
> The only reason hid_haptic_init() had try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) and
> get_device(&hdev->dev) (and their counterparts in hid_haptic_destroy())
> was to work around input_ff_destroy() previously being called only from
> input_dev_release(), which could be deferred until after hdev was
> unbound or the driver module was unloaded if userspace kept the evdev
> node open.

Thanks for the clarification. Yeah, it was a painful design...

> 
> I am queuing an input core change ("Input: destroy force-feedback device
> on input unregistration") [1] that calls input_ff_destroy() directly in
> __input_unregister_device() once all handlers are disconnected and the
> device is removed from sysfs.
> 
> With that change in place, hid_haptic_destroy() is guaranteed to run
> synchronously during input_unregister_device() while hdev is still bound
> and alive (and dev->dev.parent already holds a reference to &hdev->dev
> anyway). That means get_device(&hdev->dev) / put_device(&hdev->dev) and
> try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) / module_put(THIS_MODULE) are not needed at
> all here (until patch 8/9 where hid-haptic becomes a separate plugin
> module and hid_plugin_get() is taken before calling self_plugin->init()),
> and simply dropping them eliminates the error path after
> input_ff_create(). It also avoids the devres lifetime issue with
> put_device(&hdev->dev) mentioned in patch 1/9.

Thanks for fixing the ff core and reviewing this series! The lifecycle of
ff does look much better with your patch.

I will follow your suggestion to simplify the fixes in the series and
resubmit it when your patch lands.

Thanks,
Rong

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/2f722967b6db0692d4dd4164aff39b62@gmail.com/
> 
> Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 17:53 [PATCH v3 0/9] HID: Add hid-plugin framework & convert haptic into a plugin Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] HID: haptic: Fix use-after-free when draining workqueue Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] HID: haptic: Get rid of input_ff_destroy() in error paths Rong Zhang
2026-11-13  5:50   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-11-13 15:48     ` Rong Zhang [this message]
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] HID: haptic, multitouch: Check haptic prerequisite properly Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] HID: haptic, multitouch: Fix haptic device double-free and unnecessary allocation Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] HID: haptic: Postpone GET_REPORT to init Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] HID: haptic: Convert simple methods into static inline ones Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] HID: Add hid-plugin framework for loadable plugin modules Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] HID: haptic: Convert into a loadable plugin module Rong Zhang
2026-11-12 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] HID: haptic: Remove stubs in favor of inlined dead code elimination Rong Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b1d3cd7d5d6ef4029285d0a7ddb79be7b7fd131.camel@rong.moe \
    --to=i@rong.moe \
    --cc=aczubak@google.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rydberg@bitmath.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®