mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: index buffer_tree using node size
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 08:14:03 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b29d4b8-c823-44d0-8647-a53a09e20b5f@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512172321.3004779-1-neelx@suse.com>



在 2025/5/13 02:53, Daniel Vacek 写道:
> So far we are deriving the buffer tree index using the sector size. But each
> extent buffer covers multiple sectors. This makes the buffer tree rather sparse.
> 
> For example the typical and quite common configuration uses sector size of 4KiB
> and node size of 16KiB. In this case it means the buffer tree is using up to
> the maximum of 25% of it's slots. Or in other words at least 75% of the tree
> slots are wasted as never used.
> 
> We can score significant memory savings on the required tree nodes by indexing
> the tree using the node size instead. As a result far less slots are wasted
> and the tree can now use up to all 100% of it's slots this way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>

I'm fine with this change, but I still believe, we should address 
unaligned tree blocks before doing this.

As this requires all tree blocks are nodesize aligned.

If we have some metadata chunks which starts at a bytenr that is not 
node size aligned, all tree blocks inside that chunk will not be 
nodesize aligned and causing problems.

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/disk-io.c   |  1 +
>   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>   fs/btrfs/fs.h        |  3 ++-
>   3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 5bcf11246ba66..dcea5b0a2db50 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3395,6 +3395,7 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>   	fs_info->delalloc_batch = sectorsize * 512 * (1 + ilog2(nr_cpu_ids));
>   
>   	fs_info->nodesize = nodesize;
> +	fs_info->node_bits = ilog2(nodesize);
>   	fs_info->sectorsize = sectorsize;
>   	fs_info->sectorsize_bits = ilog2(sectorsize);
>   	fs_info->csums_per_leaf = BTRFS_MAX_ITEM_SIZE(fs_info) / fs_info->csum_size;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 4d3584790cf7f..80a8563a25add 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_buffer *e
>   	 */
>   	spin_lock(&eb->refs_lock);
>   	if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags)) {
> -		XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
> +		XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->node_bits);
>   		unsigned long flags;
>   
>   		set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags);
> @@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ static void set_btree_ioerr(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   static void buffer_tree_set_mark(const struct extent_buffer *eb, xa_mark_t mark)
>   {
>   	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
> -	XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
> +	XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->node_bits);
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	xas_lock_irqsave(&xas, flags);
> @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static void buffer_tree_set_mark(const struct extent_buffer *eb, xa_mark_t mark)
>   static void buffer_tree_clear_mark(const struct extent_buffer *eb, xa_mark_t mark)
>   {
>   	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
> -	XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
> +	XA_STATE(xas, &fs_info->buffer_tree, eb->start >> fs_info->node_bits);
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	xas_lock_irqsave(&xas, flags);
> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ static unsigned int buffer_tree_get_ebs_tag(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   	rcu_read_lock();
>   	while ((eb = find_get_eb(&xas, end, tag)) != NULL) {
>   		if (!eb_batch_add(batch, eb)) {
> -			*start = (eb->start + eb->len) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +			*start = (eb->start + eb->len) >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   			goto out;
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ static struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer_nolock(
>   		struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start)
>   {
>   	struct extent_buffer *eb;
> -	unsigned long index = start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +	unsigned long index = start >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   
>   	rcu_read_lock();
>   	eb = xa_load(&fs_info->buffer_tree, index);
> @@ -2114,8 +2114,8 @@ void btrfs_btree_wait_writeback_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
>   				      u64 end)
>   {
>   	struct eb_batch batch;
> -	unsigned long start_index = start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> -	unsigned long end_index = end >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +	unsigned long start_index = start >> fs_info->node_bits;
> +	unsigned long end_index = end >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   
>   	eb_batch_init(&batch);
>   	while (start_index <= end_index) {
> @@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>   
>   	eb_batch_init(&batch);
>   	if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
> -		index = (mapping->writeback_index << PAGE_SHIFT) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +		index = (mapping->writeback_index << PAGE_SHIFT) >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   		end = -1;
>   
>   		/*
> @@ -2160,8 +2160,8 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
>   		 */
>   		scanned = (index == 0);
>   	} else {
> -		index = wbc->range_start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> -		end = wbc->range_end >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +		index = wbc->range_start >> fs_info->node_bits;
> +		end = wbc->range_end >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   
>   		scanned = 1;
>   	}
> @@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   	eb->fs_info = fs_info;
>   again:
>   	xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree);
> -	exists = __xa_cmpxchg(&fs_info->buffer_tree, start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits,
> +	exists = __xa_cmpxchg(&fs_info->buffer_tree, start >> fs_info->node_bits,
>   			      NULL, eb, GFP_NOFS);
>   	if (xa_is_err(exists)) {
>   		ret = xa_err(exists);
> @@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   again:
>   	xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree);
>   	existing_eb = __xa_cmpxchg(&fs_info->buffer_tree,
> -				   start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits, NULL, eb,
> +				   start >> fs_info->node_bits, NULL, eb,
>   				   GFP_NOFS);
>   	if (xa_is_err(existing_eb)) {
>   		ret = xa_err(existing_eb);
> @@ -3456,7 +3456,7 @@ static int release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   		 * in this case.
>   		 */
>   		xa_cmpxchg_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree,
> -			       eb->start >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits, eb, NULL,
> +			       eb->start >> fs_info->node_bits, eb, NULL,
>   			       GFP_ATOMIC);
>   
>   		btrfs_leak_debug_del_eb(eb);
> @@ -4294,9 +4294,9 @@ static int try_release_subpage_extent_buffer(struct folio *folio)
>   {
>   	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = folio_to_fs_info(folio);
>   	struct extent_buffer *eb;
> -	unsigned long start = folio_pos(folio) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> +	unsigned long start = folio_pos(folio) >> fs_info->node_bits;
>   	unsigned long index = start;
> -	unsigned long end = index + (PAGE_SIZE >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits) - 1;
> +	unsigned long end = index + (PAGE_SIZE >> fs_info->node_bits) - 1;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	xa_lock_irq(&fs_info->buffer_tree);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/fs.h b/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> index cf805b4032af3..8c9113304fabe 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/fs.h
> @@ -778,8 +778,9 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
>   
>   	struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
>   
> -	/* Entries are eb->start / sectorsize */
> +	/* Entries are eb->start >> node_bits */
>   	struct xarray buffer_tree;
> +	int node_bits;
>   
>   	/* Next backup root to be overwritten */
>   	int backup_root_index;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-12 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-12 17:23 Daniel Vacek
2025-05-12 20:20 ` David Sterba
2025-05-13  7:56   ` Daniel Vacek
2025-05-13  8:08     ` Daniel Vacek
2025-05-13 17:10     ` David Sterba
2025-05-14  9:55       ` Daniel Vacek
2025-05-12 22:44 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-05-13  8:05   ` Daniel Vacek
2025-05-13  8:10     ` Qu Wenruo
2025-05-13 10:12 ` Filipe Manana
2025-05-13 14:37   ` Daniel Vacek
2025-06-06 17:28 ` David Sterba
2025-06-12  8:34   ` Daniel Vacek
2025-06-12  8:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Vacek
2025-06-20 12:57   ` David Sterba
2025-06-23 14:04     ` Daniel Vacek
2025-06-23 14:25       ` David Sterba
2025-07-04 16:09         ` Daniel Vacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b29d4b8-c823-44d0-8647-a53a09e20b5f@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neelx@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®