From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751557AbeAWQuI (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:50:08 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:64541 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbeAWQuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:50:06 -0500 Subject: Re: mfd: Patch management? To: Lee Jones Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , =?UTF-8?Q?Lars_P=c3=b6schel?= , Samuel Ortiz References: <9c50fe6a-21cc-e49d-1b10-5d2457ed4e2a@users.sourceforge.net> <20180123125851.ysypf7375sjlgsc6@dell> <20180123130130.powyttapsx3djawx@dell> <20180123151419.prwq62c7gpsnpbx3@dell> <20180123163130.h6ygmzig7syafxbh@dell> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <4b525322-424d-328b-a348-626a26da8f61@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:49:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180123163130.h6ygmzig7syafxbh@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:apF0UMDW+us+cOitN6ueHHyRJd1rtECVJ9EfT4fShFlyivvWR9x yqUgKsoMTT5o2tQTpMvXyChvAffD8AyI5VwvjOW1Vxg31IbeWiUC0aBi6n85DFkMibzYkDp UfJeaAN6G3JEAtOGniDykjqI9FrTeKNDJ5Md8gTKEA909sbZgvJbIaXWDn28o7vezQtpZ7w PVzmclj/bBoxY4RFtpl4A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mbOfAGHgDYI=:ImLHGsIFJ+ChRDKw7BdtcJ RwEfS3diZFiV/sVaS/OnufGPjqf600hpnXBYPK1K7tDFbPS0weW3eXij+JtLdRS53RT48dKuI /cpG6lBZJivflqzKKjevGztMdKgEBemQzydzTboFMVQ47490wMDYqgOpo4aHvO/Pi6vLNIxlx bVHKdsmxU4w5YcxVb4JtgDDsYeNtpUnRHmAPbdix3RWMUi1hjjdPqfYUprqQyWBq7nxY6NIUx 1VvfOhrejhReKiuZI9VONQdRdBh9orTkoj+sERu/P2PmHudjlaEEvHnQdFR8NOewlc74HvxP0 3HPj1uMZENHVvIcb2owYf6eH1pJaNrdkqCphf2brIrsuDG2bI/kyy6+zsI4Q2Tn+6pA1oB+aG o+JbrhzXvPyPsyma6NX5AF8dEVM9DOyY9OIHc+wf2kYVP+gQaMUqPZfycriPqGQFE0oU2bLuB eiSGQZbYLvFr8ub1WtCLkbLKAFrzF9ku4wYH77ffrpzA4N2IaBc6Z5/2A2nwYsmSeiwo58r8b p5+0uPD2GEsDx3wo7U1e4EFwVXKCV1T5hgcKQEIEda+lxfCJ8W47lcw6s4EXYPCkSEnU76PzY OZcZ8JpRAkQeykSmN2Az3QAWvfLumW6VrUA4GJo6lMRGctTgvuh+zl0EeHe5FmxDAvpcQp5zT 5KvKsD6Dp3GzNWmpAuxWbhFNdeeck9j2hfOFkRWMoh5JqODw4CeCC12Up0IwWJAEqm6usqs38 h9VxY74Oce/WkKf69xcA12uQbZGlyjWHjR5n+67nb6DxX0RR5fzH0JGB8dPptZ7L8srZE3QPg tD1Mycqv6Hw2MfVFbQVdwg5aCJJ5VNJB6udRGDGTVVSasBI/ls= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > What I should do really is ask you to take all similar (remove error > message, don't use sizeof(struct X), remove '== NULL') changes and > squash them into single patches. I would try such an approach more often if I would get also more promising indications of corresponding change acceptance besides other software development “surprises”. > However, I realise that you might want the "upstream creds", > so I won't do that I find this view interesting somehow. > -- but not at the expense of my time/effort. > > The two choices are to squash or to create a set. This information triggers recurring difficulties around differences in the preferred patch granularity. Regards, Markus