mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, hare@suse.com,
	jmeneghi@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@fb.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	michael.christie@oracle.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nilay@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] scsi: scsi-multipath: Add basic ALUA support
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:25:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bb3cff8-92aa-4635-a423-96c6f6294c77@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abTokAgL5B8NS8ae@redhat.com>

On 14/03/2026 04:48, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>> +			ext_hdr_unsupp = true;
>> +			goto retry;
>> +		}
>> +		/*
>> +		 * If the array returns with 'ALUA state transition'
>> +		 * sense code here it cannot return RTPG data during
>> +		 * transition. So set the state to 'transitioning' directly.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (sense_hdr.sense_key == NOT_READY &&
>> +		    sense_hdr.asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr.ascq == 0x0a)
>> +			goto out;
> This check is odd. First, we don't set the state to 'transitioning' like
> the comment says. We don't set alua_state at all, which ends up meaning
> that it stays as 0 (SCSI_ACCESS_STATE_OPTIMAL). It seems like we should
> explicitly set it and make the comment reflect that, if just to aid
> understanding of the logic.

Yeah, I have to admit that this is all bodged the a bit, as 
transitioning is not properly handled. Instead of "basic" ALUA support, 
this really is limited ALUA support.

I am now looking at a way to have a core scsi ALUA driver to handle all 
of this, but it is challenging as we need to continue ALUA DH support.

> 
> Nitpick: Also, this is the only place where we goto out. All the other
> checks individually free the buffer and return directly. I realize that
> all the other checks that exit early are errors, but it seems like we
> could just return a variable at the end of the function.

Sure, I can pay attention to this. However, as mentioned above, I am 
experimenting with moving any ALUA specifics into scsi core code.

> 
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Retry on any other UNIT ATTENTION occurred.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (sense_hdr.sense_key == UNIT_ATTENTION) {
>> +			scsi_print_sense_hdr(sdev, __func__, &sense_hdr);
>> +			kfree(buff);
>> +			return -EAGAIN;
>> +		}
> If we get a UNIT ATTENTION, we end up failing scsi_mpath_dev_alloc(),
> not retrying. Aside from the comment being wrong, it seems very brittle
> to fail here, just because we got a UNIT ATTENTION.

Ack

Thanks,
John



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 11:49 [PATCH 0/8] scsi-multipath: Basic " John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] libmultipath: add mpath_call_for_all_devices() John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: Do not attach for SCSI native multipath John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 3/8] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: Pass submit_rtpg() a bool for extended header support John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 4/8] scsi: Create a core ALUA driver John Garry
2026-03-14  4:35   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-03-16  9:12     ` John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] scsi: scsi-multipath: Add basic ALUA support John Garry
2026-03-10 13:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-10 15:52     ` John Garry
2026-03-10 17:54       ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-10 18:13         ` John Garry
2026-03-14  4:48   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-03-16  9:25     ` John Garry [this message]
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] scsi: scsi-multipath: Maintain sdev->access_state John Garry
2026-03-10 13:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-10 15:54     ` John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] scsi: scsi-multipath: Issue a periodic TUR per path John Garry
2026-03-10 13:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-10 17:21     ` John Garry
2026-03-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 8/8] scsi: scsi-multipath: Add stubbed scsi_multipath_dev_rescan() John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4bb3cff8-92aa-4635-a423-96c6f6294c77@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®