From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6764C38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC82B2083B for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726690AbgEGMPE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 08:15:04 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:22266 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726134AbgEGMPD (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 08:15:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 047C2nPp110477; Thu, 7 May 2020 08:14:53 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30u8ssj215-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 May 2020 08:14:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 047CCvgQ017993; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:14:48 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30s0g5ub1d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 May 2020 12:14:48 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 047CEkLj655816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 May 2020 12:14:46 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298A211C04A; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:14:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C2A11C04C; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:14:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.34.251] (unknown [9.199.34.251]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:14:43 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update numastat explanation To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko References: <20200507120217.12313-1-vbabka@suse.cz> From: Sandipan Das Message-ID: <4bc07af8-d07f-77d5-36b7-ba4be9e07ee7@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:44:42 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200507120217.12313-1-vbabka@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-07_06:2020-05-07,2020-05-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=832 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005070099 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/05/20 5:32 pm, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > During recent patch discussion [1] it became apparent that the "other_node" > definition in the numastat documentation has always been different from actual > implementation. It was also noted that the stats can be innacurate on systems > with memoryless nodes. > > This patch corrects the other_node definition (with minor tweaks to two more > definitions), adds a note about memoryless nodes and also two introductory > paragraphs to the numastat documentation. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200504070304.127361-1-sandipan@linux.ibm.com/T/#u > > [...] > Thanks again. Acked-by: Sandipan Das