From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753216AbeBLS0N (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:26:13 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:44856 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295AbeBLS0M (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:26:12 -0500 Cc: Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: juno: Describe the full GICv2m region To: Robin Murphy , Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau References: <20180207143255.17003-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20180207143255.17003-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com> From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <4bdc6616-c616-9d28-797d-fb445f263e22@arm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:26:09 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Robin, On 12/02/18 18:22, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 12/02/18 18:17, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 07/02/18 14:32, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> From: Robin Murphy >>> >>> Juno's GICv2m implementation consists of four frames providing 32 >>> interrupts each. Since it is possible to plug in enough PCIe endpoints >>> to consume more than 32 MSIs, and the driver already has a bodge to >>> handle multiple frames, let's expose the other three as well. >>> >> >> Change on it own looks good. So if you want to merge via your tree: >> >> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla >> >> Let me know if you decide not to take it via your tree and you want me >> to send it to arm-soc. >> >> On the side note I just noticed the Juno TRM[1] has 64k for each of >> these MSI frames(page 3-24 section 3.3.5 Application memory map summary) >> >> I am not sure if TRM is wrong. This patch is just copying the 4k size >> from frame 0 which got added with initial Juno DTS. > > Depends what your point of view is: The address map allocates 64KB worth > of space for the device, but the device itself only decodes the first > 4KB of that. My view is that the DT is describing the actual devices, > not the interconnect routing between them, so there's really no need to > tell consumers to map known-useless empty space. > Thanks for the clarification. -- Regards, Sudeep