From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFF2C433F5 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5636113B for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230494AbhKDJzU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:55:20 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:56132 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229809AbhKDJzT (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 05:55:19 -0400 X-UUID: aea61afcbd5647fe98e74fb0f2433ad9-20211104 X-UUID: aea61afcbd5647fe98e74fb0f2433ad9-20211104 Received: from mtkexhb02.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.103)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1794290791; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 17:52:37 +0800 Received: from mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.34) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:52:36 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07 (172.21.84.99) by mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:52:36 +0800 Message-ID: <4c3036d8181c788fbf047883e2f49172edbe3f0f.camel@mediatek.com> Subject: Re: [RESEND, v13 2/4] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller From: James Lo To: Rob Herring CC: , Hsin-Hsiung Wang , , Matthias Brugger , , , Stephen Boyd , "Rob Herring" , , Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:52:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1635944770.215632.1040288.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20211103081021.9917-1-james.lo@mediatek.com> <20211103081021.9917-3-james.lo@mediatek.com> <1635944770.215632.1040288.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 08:06 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:10:19 +0800, James Lo wrote: > > This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek > > SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang > > --- > > .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml | 76 > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m > dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > /builds/robherring/linux-dt- > review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk- > pmif.example.dt.yaml: spmi@10027000: reg: [[268595200, 3584], > [268603392, 256]] is too long > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt- > review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml > /builds/robherring/linux-dt- > review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk- > pmif.example.dt.yaml: spmi@10027000: reg: [[268595200, 3584], > [268603392, 256]] is too long > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt- > review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): > > See > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1550144__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yBdAIu8sF9FdGe9H9yO19pC0PvopKz_1DwYCmY0g5pqXvOC6acHZh_NfySMb2x_n$ > > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a > patch > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up > to > date: > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > Please check and re-submit. > Dear Rob, Due to [RESEND,v13,2/4] depends on [RESEND,v13,1/4], so we local can pass yaml when apply all 4 patches, and fail only apply [RESEND,v13,2/4] as your bot's result. Should we merge [RESEND,v13,2/4] and [RESEND,v13,2/4] to one patch ? Or Could your bot help to run yaml check for all 4 patches applied (one series) ? Many thanks