From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, zi.li@linux.dev,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hung_task: fix objtool sibling call warning in watchdog()
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:29:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c39dd4f-0aab-47b5-8424-4e0f23221623@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731175951.GC1455142@ax162>
On 2025/8/1 01:59, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:39:34AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>
>> The kernel test robot reported an objtool warning on the loongarch
>> architecture with clang:
>>
>> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: watchdog+0x418: sibling call from
>> callable instruction with modified stack frame
>>
>> To resolve this, explicitly prevent the compiler from inlining or
>> performing a tail call on check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() by marking
>> it with the noinline attribute. This ensures a standard function call
>> with a proper stack frame, satisfying objtool's validation requirements.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507301256.cZlxQ10s-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
> While this may solve that particular instance of the warning, the fact
> there are many, many more with that configuration indicates that there
> will need to be a more generalized fix. I have started a separate thread
> with some LoongArch folks around this issue:
Thanks for the heads-up!
Yes, you're right, a more general fix is definitely the way to go.
I'll keep an eye on that thread and see how I can help ;)
Thanks,
Lance
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/20250731175655.GA1455142@ax162/
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
>> ---
>> kernel/hung_task.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
>> index 8708a1205f82..a5b5a0a2c262 100644
>> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
>> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static bool rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct *g, struct task_struct *t)
>> * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out
>> * a warning.
>> */
>> -static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
>> +static noinline void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
>> {
>> int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
>> unsigned long last_break = jiffies;
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 2:39 Lance Yang
2025-07-31 17:59 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-08-01 1:29 ` Lance Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c39dd4f-0aab-47b5-8424-4e0f23221623@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zi.li@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®